Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.lisp
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Implementation Favoritism, a question of Lisp mindsets
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tim Bradshaw  
View profile  
 More options Apr 17 2003, 12:58 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Tim Bradshaw <t...@cley.com>
Date: 17 Apr 2003 17:44:29 +0100
Local: Thurs, Apr 17 2003 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: Implementation Favoritism, a question of Lisp mindsets
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

* Mark Conrad wrote:
> Multiprocessing is not fine-grained enough, it can't resume operation
> at the exact spot in the function where operation was previously
> suspended.

Look, this is not hard.

(let  ((x (make-lock :name "wait" :state :unlocked)))
  (values (make-thread
            "foo"
            #'(lambda ()
                ...
                (wait x)
                ...))
          x))

--tim


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google