The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Majorinc Kazimir <fa...@false.false>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 21:01:41 +0200
Local: Sun, May 4 2008 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
In article <daadad58-b292-4a26-a63f-35ec24af3450
@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, philip.armit...@gmail.com says... > than a fault of the language itself. As for "average programmer", it's Average programmer is say, one who mostly rely on available > less clear what that means. If it means programmers who are not libraries and only occasionally implement complex algorithms on his own. His programs might be large but they are mostly made of simple pieces that need to be connected together without bugs. I think abstract programming languages provide little advantage for that kind of job; their advantages show mainly if one has to develop and test many original and complicated algorithms - and needs for that decrease due to growing libraries, databases etc. It is not fault of the programming language. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||