Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme, comp.lang.lisp
From: Adrian Kubala <adr...@sixfingeredman.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:41:14 -0600
Local: Mon, Nov 10 2003 3:41 pm
Subject: Re: web application framework
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Noel Welsh wrote: At this level I don't see what great advantage WebIt! provides over a > WebIt! is that "lowest-level layer" (and a bit of the middle layer). > For example, it sounds like you want to write code like: > (define name-form > That could be a valid WebIt! document and you'd then write a WebIt! handful of format-string functions. And if I needed to write AST->AST transformations, why not do it with macros? I will concede that maybe all the macros and functions I'd write would end up re-implementing WebIt!, or maybe there's some emergent benefits to the collective WebIt! system that I don't see yet. But since you asked I'd like to at least write code like this, which is ;;;;; But I'm hoping that I'll discover some completely new ways to do things. > You could use SISC and write bindings for the Java toolkits that do That's a good idea I hadn't considered, thanks. > what you want. This is less work and has been done succesfully in > industry. See e.g. "Scheme in the Real World" at > http://www.lshift.net/news.280903lispconference.html You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||