Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme, comp.lang.functional, comp.lang.python, comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.haskell
From: Howard Brazee <how...@brazee.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:57:41 -0700
Local: Mon, Nov 22 2010 10:57 am
Subject: Re: Scheme as a virtual machine?
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 05:38:53 +0100, Ertugrul Söylemez <e...@ertes.de>
>Haskell is a simple language with a comparably small specification.I wonder how much that difficulty is innate, and how much is due to
>It's not as simple as Common Lisp, but it's simple. Note that simple
>doesn't mean easy. Haskell is certainly more difficult to learn than
>other languages, which explains the low number of success stories. On
>the other hand, I'm doing rapid web development in it.
learning other languages first.
I'm an old time CoBOL programmer, and know of quite a few people who
- James Madison
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.