Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.lisp
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Future of lisp?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tim Bradshaw  
View profile  
 More options Sep 14 2011, 12:01 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Tim Bradshaw <t...@tfeb.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:01:19 +0100
Local: Wed, Sep 14 2011 12:01 pm
Subject: Re: Future of lisp?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 2011-09-14 16:36:27 +0100, Alessio Stalla said:

> 'd like to add a very important point: even if you don't write
> complex macros, you can use macros written by others.

This argument is like saying that I don't need to understand how to
design high-performance microprocessors to benefit from them but can
use ones designed by other people.  Indeed I can, but I would not call
myself a microprocessor designer.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google