Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Dead software (was: A draft business plan for free software LISP vendors)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Fernando D. Mato Mira  
View profile  
 More options Mar 8 1999, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: "Fernando D. Mato Mira" <matom...@iname.com>
Date: 1999/03/08
Subject: Dead software (was: A draft business plan for free software LISP vendors)

> I have a sad story to tell (please anyone correct me if I'm wrong):
> satisfied customers of ILOG Talk have developed a lot of software for it,
> and contributed infrastructure back to ILOG, who incorporated it in
> the main source. All in all, it's been a happy story for 7 years.
> But one day, ILOG decided it was not making money in the LISP business,
> and announced Talk would no more be maintained. Good bye, bug fixes,
> good bye ports, good bye ILOG Talk.

> Remaining customers promptly decided to migrate
> all their development to C++, Java, Smalltalk, or whatever they could.
> All their code base was technically lost.
> Even though they could negociate the use of sources for Talk as customers,
> and even though their maintenance contract will last a few more years,
> they would have to do all maintenance in-house afterwards,
> and not be able to reuse the resulting code for other projects
> or share it with others. Economically, their code is DEAD,
> and it will soon be in every other meanings of the term.

I suddenly realized that the current model where when a company goes
bankrupt or decides to kill a product and the source is not released is WRONG.
Maybe if some people get bitten like this in the States or countries with similar
legal systems, they should file a class action lawsuit in the hope of establishing
a precedent so that things like that cannot happen anymore. Besides that, people
should start asking for such kind of thing when negotiating a purchase. Management
of the living company should not have much trouble giving in, as they are supposed
to be in "the company will live forever and our products will be a success". Saying
no
implies they are uncertain about their future and sends out a "you'd better look
somewhere else"
message.

  vcard.vcf
< 1K Download

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.