Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion object address
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
TheFlyingDutchman  
View profile  
 More options Dec 8 2010, 12:03 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: TheFlyingDutchman <zzbba...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 8 2010 12:03 pm
Subject: Re: object address
On Dec 8, 1:01 am, Tim Bradshaw <t...@tfeb.org> wrote:

> On 2010-12-07 18:37:32 +0000, TheFlyingDutchman said:

> > As far as your example, you could bring your own coffee blend and even
> > your own coffee maker to your cubicle or the office kitchen. Many
> > people do that around the world who are coffee snobs. I would find
> > some other negative for the next iteration.

> Actually, it's a pretty good analogy, as you've probably read the
> followup about buying a personal license / funding development as a
> version of the personal coffee maker thing.

Putting some money towards a Lisp project makes up for working 8 hours
a day every day with languages you aren't interested in alongside
programmers who you disdain, versus working 8 hours a day with the top
percentile of programmers as documented by Let Over Lamdba.

> > With your Usenet history demonstrating a tremendous passion for Common
> > Lisp, it is hard to concieve of a problem domain that would be able to
> > draw you away from the language you love so dearly and force you to
> > program shoulder to shoulder with cargo-cult programmers using
> > languages which you find uninteresting. And a problem domain for which
> > you, with your Common Lisp expertise, couldn't convince management
> > team to solve at least a portion of it with Common Lisp.

> It's a little surprising to me that you understand my interests so much
> better than I do, as well as understanding what I do well enough to
> know that CL is obviously such a good fit for it.

Perhaps you can share what you do?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.