Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.lisp
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion adjustable arrays
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tim Bradshaw  
View profile  
 More options May 2 2010, 4:28 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Tim Bradshaw <t...@tfeb.org>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 09:28:12 +0100
Local: Sun, May 2 2010 4:28 am
Subject: Re: adjustable arrays
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 2010-04-29 18:14:55 +0100, Peter Keller said:

> 546MB up to 1.640GB.

> Now this needed memory for which I can easily account!

> That is a lot of memory to keep resident and perform churn on and hence
> why I'm very paranoid about consing or calling make-array.  I use other
> libraries and things and who knows what their memory usages are. But
> at the scaling levels I'm desiring, I have to pay attention to it.

10 years ago this was a lot of memory.  Now it's small change.  50 or
100G is something to think about, but less than 4 doesn't count for
much unless you're planning on some vast number of instances.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google