Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion LISP - 2 exponent 0 = 1
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ilias  
View profile  
 More options Sep 21 2002, 4:24 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: ilias <at_n...@pontos.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:32:47 +0300
Local: Sat, Sep 21 2002 4:32 am
Subject: Re: LISP - 2 exponent 0 = 1

Marco Antoniotti wrote:
> ilias <at_n...@pontos.net> writes:

>>Marco Antoniotti wrote:

>>>ilias <at_n...@pontos.net> writes:

>>>>larry wrote:

>>>>>ilias,
>>>>>Would you be willing to take the Turing test to determine if
>>>>>you're a human?

>>>>Explain me with easy terminology (i'm undereducated) what a Turing
>>>>test is.

>>>Something you have been trying very hard to pass. :)
>>>The Turing Test is a way of dettermine if a "machine" has achieved
>>>"intelligence".  Or, in a more limited way, it is a test to see
>>>whether the response of a machine and the response of a human are
>>>indistiguishable by a group of witnesses.

judge: group of witnesses.

>>>A simple Google search will fill in the details.
>>>Since it has been suggested up here that you are actually an A.I.,
>>>the
>>>fact that you show ignorance of the Turing Test could be seen as a
>>>ruse by your programmer(s) to fool the denizens of C.L.L. into
>>>thinking that you are actually human.

>>sounds like 'paranoia'.

> Do you mean that you are paranoic or that I am paranoic.

"could be seen" => paranoia.

> Are we like Eliza and Parry?

irrlevant.

>>>>Then i can answer you.

>>>That *is* a good answer.  Either you do have a sense of irony
>>>(something people doubted, looking at the responses you get) or your
>>>programmer(s) did program some of it into you. :)

>>OK, i've understood.

> What?

 >>>>Explain me with easy terminology (i'm undereducated) what a Turing
 >>>>test is.

Turing Test.

>>But i remember the name Turing in context of programing-languages.

> Do a search on Google for Alan Turing (1912-1954).

He dies young.

>>Is Lisp Turing-Complete?

> Yes.

>>What is 'Turing-Complete'?

> Essentially, a programming language L is Turing Complete if there
> exists an algorithm transforming a program in L into the code for a
> Turing machine.

what is a 'Turing machine'?

>>I cannot extract a meaning, based on the information 'Turing-Test' you
>>just gave me.

> I can only point the direction.  Books and Google are ther for this

you don't pass my 'Turing Test'.

> reason.  Everybody has time constraints which are best spent doing
> real work instead of quibbling on minutiae of the Common Lisp
> specification.

remark irrelevant.

> My version of the Turing test would ask to discriminate between
> relevant and irrelevant issue in the line of questions and answers.

> And note that I would be the judge. :)

thus the quality of your test depends on the quality of your judge.

sounds not good.

> Cheers

Turing Test: comparing A.I. against H.I. (Human Intelligence), judged by
human intelligence.

I think i don't like the 'Turing-Test'.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.