From: PM <deja_...@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Java/Lisp Language Evolution Correlates
Date: 2000/06/15
Message-ID: <8ibnul$l1o$1@nnrp1.deja.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 635096573
References: <8i9os9$55c$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <lwog539hm6.fsf@parades.rm.cnr.it>
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 RAP_BDC, 1.0 x58.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 150.173.243.1
Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy.
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Jun 15 23:13:39 2000 GMT
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDdeja_pcm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt)

In article <lwog539hm6....@parades.rm.cnr.it>,
  Marco Antoniotti <marc...@parades.rm.cnr.it> wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe we need a “Scheme” version of Java?
>
> First we need DEFSTRUCT and multidimensional arrays *in* RxRS :)
>

Definately a DEFSTRUCT in Scheme would be _very_ nice. I don't know why
this wasn't introduced years ago.

I'm not so sure about multidimensional arrays though.  Could these be
better handled by a library or class in some hypothetical OO version of
scheme?

> Marco Antoniotti ===========================================

Peter ----------------------------------------------------



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.