Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Summary of Lisp meeting Dec. 11th in Berlin
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Andreas Hinze  
View profile  
 More options Dec 12 2003, 10:43 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Andreas Hinze <a...@smi.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:43:42 +0100
Local: Fri, Dec 12 2003 10:43 am
Subject: Summary of Lisp meeting Dec. 11th in Berlin
Hi all,
here a short summary of our LISP meeting yesterday in Berlin
(I tried to translate my german summary. Please apologise possible odds)

James Anderson, Benno Biewer, Niels Gösche, Joerg-Cyril Hoehle,
Sven Köhler and i met at 5pm.
James had prepared two short talks about XML and a JAVA->LISP translator.

We start with a discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of XML.
James shows a nice example which uses XML to allow independent development
of content and look of a HTML page. He had organized a G4 powerbook and so
we are able to look how it works in practice.
The LISP & XML theme poped up again over the whole evening. This was obvious
since James wrote CL-XML, a XML parser that simplyfies the handling of XML remarkable.

Our second major topic was a JAVA->Lisp translator developed by James (a nice
point: both tools are based on an ATN parser originally developed by Benno).
James demonstrated the goods and odds of automatic translation with a short
example. It shows that while the translation itself works remarkable good, the
result still needs some reworks due to semantic differences and (obviously) missing
Java compatible libraries.

The rest of the evening was spend to a lot of small themes like "Does feature X
from MCL is also available in LWW" over "What are you doing with LISP" up to
"In Smalltalk it is possible to ...". In summary all themes that can better be
discussed in a bar than in front of a computer monitor.

Overall, it was a great evening and we will shure meet again.

Special thanks to James who spend a lot of energy to give two excellent
presentations of excellent LISP tools.

Regards
AHz


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.