Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Understanding Erik Naggum

Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!ps01-sjc1!news.webusenet.com!pd2nf1so.cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news2.calgary.shaw.ca.POSTED!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.84.56.46
From: Brian Palmer <br...@invalid.dom>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Understanding Erik Naggum
Message-ID: <MPG.180cccf17ae0db7f9896ac@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net>
References: <pan.2002.09.24.02.42.59.437455.20476@debian-rs.org> <anlpkj$baf$1@newsreader2.netcologne.de> <3242810821019218@naggum.no> <anmtvd$nv0$1@newsreader2.netcologne.de> <3D9F0775.4080407@nyc.rr.com> <ann3al$5vf$1@newsreader2.netcologne.de> <Xns929E86CA29F9Amspitze1optonlinenet@167.206.3.3> <anoe4f$1bc$1@newsreader2.netcologne.de> <Xns929F1B1F3C851mspitze1optonlinenet@167.206.3.3> <3DA05E22.8040401@nyc.rr.com> <Xns929F7E582F29mspitze1optonlinenet@167.206.3.3> <3DA06B05.6060306@nyc.rr.com> <Xns929FACD0C114mspitze1optonlinenet@167.206.3.3> <3DA0C55F.1050001@nyc.rr.com> <Xns929FC8A96E229mspitze1optonlinenet@167.206.3.3> <3DA1568E.1070707@nyc.rr.com> <Xns92A07B32D29A3mspitze1optonlinenet@167.206.3.2> <anscag$nqd$1@newsreader2.netcologne.de> <3242998337739990@naggum.no> <ant3pi$clg$1@newsreader2.netcologne.de> <3243027599800228@naggum.no> <MPG.180bff001c0cf4429896aa@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net> <anue9o$72q$1@newsreader2.netcologne.de>
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50
Lines: 14
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:08:03 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.69.255.206
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
X-Trace: news2.calgary.shaw.ca 1034104083 24.69.255.206 (Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:08:03 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:08:03 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet

costa...@web.de said...
> 
> Thanks a lot for trying to "translate". However, I am using "cold 
> language" in the same way as Erik does, as a short name for the 
> emotion-free and neutral language he is referring to.

And you believe language which lacks emotion is actually UNdesireable?  
If you would agree that is that it's up to each individual how they 
choose to phrase their posts as long as it's free of hostility, then why 
are you beating this dead horse yet again?  Just say that it's an 
approach that you prefer.  Erik will say that he thinks your approach 
has no place here.  Why try so hard to convince someone over your matter 
of opinion?  So you disagree on something... welcome to life, now get 
back to Lisp!