Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Kent M Pitman <pit...@world.std.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:25:13 GMT
Local: Wed, Aug 28 2002 11:25 am
Subject: Re: OT: No active projects at J13 ?? (was Re: Why learn Lisp)
Andreas Hinze <a...@smi.de> writes: Not in terms of its people in their offices nor in terms of its fees. > Kent M Pitman wrote: > > I personaly think ANSI is a large, too-slow, not-very-useful entity to > I didn't know that it is so slow and expensive. That explains a lot. In terms of the hidden costs of travel to meetings, of offline work, of the lead time required for notices of meetings (stretching out timetable), the publishing and review requirements (resources and temporal duration), the loss of control of intellectual property they are increasingly pushing for (we just scraped by before)... everything adds up. The easily enumerable part is loaded salary costs (salary + overhead The costs of a zillion people traveling, of the timeline being years None of this counts the cost of the community "accepting" the changes, Before making changes, one wants to believe they are going to overcome Layered standards are another matter, but require no change to the existing > > Users love to point to things like this because they want Not a problem. > > everything on a silver platter if they can get it, but the cost of > > getting this silver platter is high enough that the rough edges > > present will buy you more in terms of other things vendors could > > provide. > Right. I was only looking for the advantages of further standardisation > without thinking about the costs. > Your explaination give me a new sight to the hole topic. I didn't realize the You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||