In article <ae0auoFrl...@mid.individual.net>,
Nils M Holm <news2...@t3x.org> wrote:
> Pascal Costanza <p...@p-cos.net> wrote:Using the style guide in the first place is merely a SHOULD. So the
> > Did you read the document we're talking about? There are at least 24
> > occurrences of "must", and 32 occurrences of "should." I especially find
> > "You MUST follow conventions, they are not optional." somewhat hilarious...
> Ah, I see. I interpret "must" in technical documents as a strong
> But I agree, it sounds a bit strong in a style guide, which is
qualifiers within it should be understood in that context.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.