Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.lisp
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion can lisp do what perl does easily?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
William Deakin  
View profile  
 More options Mar 28 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: William Deakin <wi...@pindar.com>
Date: 2000/03/28
Subject: Re: can lisp do what perl does easily?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Tom Breton wrote:
> The Perl system was much easier to find and install.  RedHat bundled it, so I
> basically just pushed a button. CLISP has rpms too but they were so nonstandard
> I ended up just building it from source.

Do you think that this a serious comparison between lisp and perl?

For example: Under Linux the Debian clisp and cmucl installations are as seamless
as the perl installation. Also the under Solaris 2.6 I experienced problems
installing perl whilst found the installation of cmucl and clisp binaries to be
straightforward.

Best Regards,

:) will


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google