The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: "John Thingstad" <jpth...@online.no>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 19:09:58 +0200
Local: Sun, May 4 2008 1:09 pm
Subject: Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
På Sun, 04 May 2008 05:08:43 +0200, skrev <scholz.lot...@gmail.com>:
> On 3 Mai, 21:34, Spiros Bousbouras <spi...@gmail.com> wrote: Of course my LispWorks system supports all of the above.. >> If it's true that as we progress in time, successive >> fashionable languages resemble Lisp more and >> more then Lisp's turn should come at some point. >> Do you agree with this argument ? If yes, would > Without Unicode support, Windows Ports, true Multithreading i think It does not do 'symmetric' multiprocessing if that is what you mean. I might add that none of these things are a part of the C standard either. That hasn't prevented C from being a popular language. Common Lisp is just a common denominator for Lisp's. Commercial versions like LispWorks and ACL come with large libraries in addition to ANSI Common Lisp. As it is - it is strong enough to write real applications today. -------------- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||