Lisp Interpreter in C
MB
-Mike
Thom Goodsell
> Anybody know where I might find a C interpreter for LISP? Thanks.
> -Mike
>
Did you want an interpreter for Lisp, written in C? Or an interpreter
for C, written in Lisp? The subject and body of your message suggest
different things.
Thom
P.S. If you want the former, you might take a look at Clisp.
http://clisp.cons.org/
--
Thom Goodsell t...@cra.com
Scientist (617) 491-3474 x574
Charles River Analytics http://www.cra.com/
MB
-Mike
The Glauber
CLISP is probably the best one, and you can find links to it and some others
here: http://www.alu.org/table/systems.htm#unixfree
--
Glauber Ribeiro
thegl...@my-deja.com http://www.myvehiclehistoryreport.com
"Opinions stated are my own and not representative of Experian"
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Marco Antoniotti
MB <wbms...@aol.com> writes:
> An interpreter for LISP written in C. Sorry for any confusion.
> -Mike
Well, you can get an interpreter *and* a compiler written in C for
Common Lisp.
http://clisp.cons.org/
http://www.cons.org/cmucl
Cheers
--
Marco Antoniotti =============================================================
NYU Bioinformatics Group tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488
719 Broadway 12th Floor fax +1 - 212 - 995 4122
New York, NY 10003, USA http://galt.mrl.nyu.edu/valis
Like DNA, such a language [Lisp] does not go out of style.
Paul Graham, ANSI Common Lisp
Erik Naggum
| An interpreter for LISP written in C. Sorry for any confusion.
Why on earth do you want that? It's such a specific request you
must know what you're asking for, but I have to wonder what the
question was when "a Lisp interpreter in C" is the answer."
#:Erik
--
I agree with everything you say, but I would
attack to death your right to say it.
-- Tom Stoppard
Rainer Joswig
<mar...@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
> MB <wbms...@aol.com> writes:
>
> > An interpreter for LISP written in C. Sorry for any confusion.
> > -Mike
>
> Well, you can get an interpreter *and* a compiler written in C for
> Common Lisp.
>
> http://clisp.cons.org/
> http://www.cons.org/cmucl
CLISP, yes.
But, AFAIK, CMUCL is not written in C and doesn't compile to C.
More info about Common Lisp implementations:
http://www.lisp.org/table/systems.htm
--
Rainer Joswig, Hamburg, Germany
Email: mailto:jos...@corporate-world.lisp.de
Web: http://corporate-world.lisp.de/
Raymond Toy
Rainer> In article <y6ck8b7...@octagon.mrl.nyu.edu>, Marco Antoniotti
Rainer> <mar...@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>> MB <wbms...@aol.com> writes:
>>
>> > An interpreter for LISP written in C. Sorry for any confusion.
>> > -Mike
>>
>> Well, you can get an interpreter *and* a compiler written in C for
>> Common Lisp.
>>
>> http://clisp.cons.org/
>> http://www.cons.org/cmucl
Rainer> CLISP, yes.
Rainer> But, AFAIK, CMUCL is not written in C and doesn't compile to C.
What does "interpreter for LISP written in C" really mean anyway?
All of the interpreter in C? Just enough to interpret enough Lisp
code to write more lisp code to implement the rest of Lisp?
Clisp has a lot in C, but a lot of it is in Lisp too. Same with CMUCL
(albeit very much less in C and very much more in Lisp).
Ray