Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Doh!
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Steuber  
View profile  
 More options Dec 25 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: David Steuber <trash...@david-steuber.com>
Date: 1998/12/25
Subject: Doh!
Don't you hate it when you are using a different news reader from what
you are used to, and you accidently _mail_ replies instead of
_posting_ followups?

I wonder what Erik Naggum thought when reading an email to him,
written as though it was posted to the group, but wasn't?  I think the
word begins with an 'm' or an 'i'.  Well, it would in English.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Erik Naggum  
View profile  
 More options Dec 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.no>
Date: 1998/12/26
Subject: Re: Doh!
* David Steuber <trash...@david-steuber.com>
| I wonder what Erik Naggum thought when reading an email to him, written
| as though it was posted to the group, but wasn't?

  I have only been waiting for them to show up on the newsgroup, figuring
  they were one of those annoying copies by mail.  happens a lot.  I tend
  to wait a few days before responding to what might have been a copy of a
  posted article.  do you want them returned?  (can I correct them first? :)

#:Erik
--
  Nie wieder KrF!  Nie wieder KrF!  Nie wieder KrF!  Nie wieder KrF!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Steuber  
View profile  
 More options Dec 26 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: David Steuber <trash...@david-steuber.com>
Date: 1998/12/26
Subject: Re: Doh!

Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.no> writes:
> * David Steuber <trash...@david-steuber.com>
> | I wonder what Erik Naggum thought when reading an email to him, written
> | as though it was posted to the group, but wasn't?

>   I have only been waiting for them to show up on the newsgroup, figuring
>   they were one of those annoying copies by mail.  happens a lot.  I tend
>   to wait a few days before responding to what might have been a copy of a
>   posted article.  do you want them returned?  (can I correct them first? :)

Do as you wish :-)

I don't think I asked any important technical questions.  IIRC, I sent
you something on that people are mean thread that was otherwise
unimportant.

My clue that I screwed up was I got a bounced message.  I was rather
puzzled by it because I didn't realize I mailed anything.  I think I
got hooked on 'R' for replying in VM, which I've done a lot of
lately.  I am making a conscious effort to do 'F', or in the case of
another followup that didn't need a bunch of quoting, even though it
held very useful information, 'f'.

So, do you drive a Volvo, and what do you do when someone cuts you
off? :-)  Off course, this question is predicated on you driving a car
rather than using public transit which seems to be more advanced in
Europe than in the US.  I would also be very surprised if the majority
of Norwegians drove Volvos when it is so obvious that SAABs are better
<eg>.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Erik Naggum  
View profile  
 More options Dec 27 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.no>
Date: 1998/12/27
Subject: Re: Doh!
* David Steuber <trash...@david-steuber.com>
| So, do you drive a Volvo, and what do you do when someone cuts you off?
| :-)  Off course, this question is predicated on you driving a car rather
| than using public transit which seems to be more advanced in Europe than
| in the US.  I would also be very surprised if the majority of Norwegians
| drove Volvos when it is so obvious that SAABs are better <eg>.

  no, I don't drive a car in Norway.  I don't think anybody should.  (pet
  peeve alert!)  they should instead go on strike (as I have done) against
  the oppressive taxes levied on car owners and users.  if you want a nice
  new car, 85% of the retail price is taxes paid to the government.  (which
  is OK, really, compared to the 92% taxes paid on 60% Koskenkorva (vodka),
  which retails at NOK 294 for 500 ml, or USD 39.50 for 17 fl oz.)  when I
  had already decided against wasting USD 2,500 - USD 3,000 on a driver's
  license when it could be spent on computers, discovering what a racket
  the Government was running on car owners and users, no way I would help
  finance them.  Norway, being a pretty solid oil-producing country, also
  has _really_ expensive gasoline, most of it due to heavy taxation.  we'll
  top NOK 8.00 per liter come next year because the blessed religious-block
  government raised taxes even more.  that's more than USD 4.75 a gallon.
  oh, and the sales tax is 23%.  yeah, Norwegians put up with it.  I guess
  we're a _really_ stupid, gullible people.

  so when public transport is quite reasonable and taxi charges are so low
  there's a noticeable shortage of drivers _and_ business-related use is
  tax deductible, which using your own car effectively isn't (because they
  assume you use it more privately), I'd have to spend more than USD 17,000
  a year on car-substitute activities (taxi, home delivery of various goods
  and food, etc) to even defend the acquisition, but it's easy to cut down
  on such variable costs if you want something else that's really expensive
  (which I do a lot), but if you _have_ a nice car, you're basically locked
  in to using it and being happy with it.  I know I couldn't trade all my
  other desires in for a stupid vehicle, so I decided against it.  (most
  people have car loans, of course, so they pay for it twice, even though
  they buy a used car, so we have Europe's oldest car fleet.)  whereas cars
  give people freedom in most reasonable places on earth, _not_ having a
  car gives you freedom in Norway.  yeah, it's sick.

  Norway, it's a great country to visit.  (bring your own bottle.)

#:Erik, who's trying to figure out which topic this could be "on"


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rusty craine  
View profile  
 More options Dec 27 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: rusty craine <rccra...@flash.net>
Date: 1998/12/27
Subject: Re: Doh!

Erik Naggum wrote:
>   oh, and the sales tax is 23%.  yeah, Norwegians put up with it.  I guess
>   we're a _really_ stupid, gullible people.

It also comments on the basic honesty of the Norwegians, very commendably.  If
it were the States it would be a capitalistic opportunity.  Some of the
America's  "finest families" got their start as "Rum runners"......from "Rum
runners" to president in just a generation.

I'll be glade to send you my family recipe for "cooking corn" [moon shine].
Seems my family ran a rather large illlegal wiskey still during prohibition
times.   "Naggum's Norwegian Corn Wiskey" got a nice ring to it.  Just think
Erick, if you were illegal enough your off spring would be president [or what
ever the Norwegian chief executive is].

This would be a great muLisp application.  You could automate the process, from
fermenation to distillation.  I've already got the program written to control
the distillation temps.  We will have to give the fermenation controll program
some tought.

Rusty

PS I'll take two liters....to use medicinal of course!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Norway's `chief executive' (Ex: Re: Doh!)" by vniko...@poboxes.com
vnikolov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 28 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: vniko...@poboxes.com
Date: 1998/12/28
Subject: Re: Norway's `chief executive' (Ex: Re: Doh!)
In article <36864100.25E03...@flash.net>,
  rusty craine <rccra...@flash.net> wrote:
(...)

> [or what
> ever the Norwegian chief executive is].

My goodness!

--
Vassil Nikolov
http://www.poboxes.com/vnikolov

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "Doh!" by David Steuber
David Steuber  
View profile  
 More options Dec 28 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: David Steuber <trash...@david-steuber.com>
Date: 1998/12/28
Subject: Re: Doh!

Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.no> writes:
> #:Erik, who's trying to figure out which topic this could be "on"

alt.off.topic.misc

:-)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "OT: Norwegian honesty, or lack thereof." by Stig Hemmer
Stig Hemmer  
View profile  
 More options Dec 29 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Stig Hemmer <s...@pvv.ntnu.no>
Date: 1998/12/29
Subject: OT: Norwegian honesty, or lack thereof.

rusty craine <rccra...@flash.net> writes:
> It also comments on the basic honesty of the Norwegians, very
> commendably.  If it were the States it would be a capitalistic
> opportunity.  Some of the America's "finest families" got their
> start as "Rum runners"......from "Rum runners" to president in just
> a generation.

> I'll be glade to send you my family recipe for "cooking corn" [moon
> shine].  Seems my family ran a rather large illlegal wiskey still
> during prohibition times.

Both smuggling and moonshining are thriving industries in Norway,
thank you.  We aren't really all that honest.  At least not all of us,
a lot of people still buy taxed spirits.

Stig Hemmer,
Jack of a Few Trades.

PS: The closest thing Norway has to a 'chief executive' is our Prime
   Minister.  He does not wield the kind of power Clinton does, the
   real power lies with the Parliament.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »