kt-...@SprocketShop.com (Kenneth P. Turvey) writes:
> On 12 Dec 2000 05:28:49 +0000, Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.net> wrote: > >* Raffael Cavallaro <raff...@mediaone.net> > >| Many lurkers _do_ read Erik's postings - I know because I have received > >| emails from ...
> > Let them speak for themselves. You are not a trustworthy reporter. > [...] > not afraid to post by any means, but I do find the group less enjoyable > because of Erik's presence. This is certainly the most hostile group I > have ever read on a regular basis... in large part due to Erik.
Indeed the viciousness of his verbal abuse is appalling. It certainly deters from expressing a dissenting opinion, or any opinion for that matter :-) I came back to this newsgroup to find out where Lisp was going: well... it seems to have moved to the middle-east.
>| rOn 12 Dec 2000 15:22:20 +0000, Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.net> wrote: > categories. I feel entirely comfortable dismissing and scaring off > anyone who agrees with _your_ style, however, so if anything, I have > succeeded in chasing off some massive stupidity.
MR Nggum, the only person who is exhibing "stupidity" is your good self. Please stop doing this in your messages. Please discuss lisp. Stop these foolish and rude outbursts.
>Indeed the viciousness of his verbal abuse is appalling. It certainly >deters from expressing a dissenting opinion, or any opinion for that >matter :-) I came back to this newsgroup to find out where Lisp was >going: well... it seems to have moved to the middle-east.
Indeed. I wonder whether Mr NAGGUM attacks his cat as badly as he attacks humans.
Perhaps that is why he has CAT and no human who cares for him.
jfrank...@my-deja.com writes: > Erik's reasoning is the same as that of wife beaters and child > abusers.
I guess the `wife beaters and child abusers' are easier to find among people who hide behind deja-accounts.
[snipped insulting and totally idiotic comparison]
> The newgroup is unmoderated so there is nothing we can do can stop > Erik from ranting on this newsgroup but we should not condone it.
``We''? Who is `we'? Rather, I am wondering all the time how these stupid and unfair attacks on Erik could be stopped.
> The next time Erik goes off on someone asking a simple question
I don't remember him ever doing that, and I read his postings for years.
> people should post messages asking Erik to grow up and act like an > adult. Of course the first person to post such a message will get > blasted, but if enough people post Erik _might_ get the idea that > he's at fault and he _might_ learn something.
But of course, the thought that he might be right and you are not did never occur to you, right?
-- Nils Goesche "Don't ask for whom the <CTRL-G> tolls."
Raffael Cavallaro <raff...@mediaone.net> writes: > In article <sfwelzgime7....@world.std.com>, Kent M Pitman > <pit...@world.std.com> wrote:
> >I don't think many new posters are reading Erik's long missives. > >I think only dyed in the wool people with a serious interest are. > >I think some might be reading these anti-erik threads because they call > >attention to him. I think these do phenomenally more damage to the ng > >than anything Erik rights.
> Well the ones to whom they are addressed are _certainly_ reading them, > and they're not going to come back.
> The newcomers who get abused _do_ > read Erik's postings, and they quickly leave c.l.l, in all liklihood, > never to return.
Says who? I have been `flamed' by Erik years ago in another newsgroup, but that didn't stop my posting at all. I wasn't even upset about him, rather he actually convinced me after a few more postings.
> Many lurkers _do_ read Erik's postings - I know because I have received > emails from them which generally say something like "thanks for saying > that, I was beginning to think everyone in c.l.l was insane, because > they all come to the defense of this vicious guy Erik..." These people, > as is true of lurkers in general, are as great, or greater in number > than those who post. Many have written me to say they are _afraid_ to > post, because they don't want to be beaten up on by Erik.
But those who did not agree with you probably didn't write any Emails, so what does this prove? Posting here is much less `dangerous' than posting to comp.lang.c, for instance. But that doesn't stop people from asking questions about how to clear the screen in C, either.
> You seem far too concerned with some questionable notion that long > threads calling attention to Erik's abusive behavior will somehow > cause damage to lisp's reputation, without being much concerned at > all about the demonstrable, present damage of having the better part > of the posting newsgroup community come to the defense of a > viciously abusive poster. This atmosphere sends out a definite > message - "we don't really want you here." And it seems to succeed, > because almost no new posters stick around.
I am a `lurker' myself, but what I find really *DISGUSTING* is this kind of `show trial' of several people against Eric as a person. If you don't like him, so be it, but why do you people have to make such an issue of it? This /public accusation/ is cruel and `abusive', other than anything Erik has ever posted. -- Nils Goesche "Don't ask for whom the <CTRL-G> tolls."
* George Aksyonov <gask...@aol.com> | the only person who is exhibing "stupidity" is your good self.
Yup, take sides, post some unfair accusation like that, and you hope you contribute to something? How amazingly brilliant! Good stuff! Sure, I'll listen to someone who can't even keep himself clean. Must be a man _full_ of sound advice, indeed.
| Please stop doing this in your messages. | Please discuss lisp. | Stop these foolish and rude outbursts.
You failed to avoid rudeness yourself. You took sides and you felt it was appropriate to take part in the mud-slinging. That should tell you something _very_ important.
You had _one_ opportunity not to start what you have started, and did not choose to use it. I'm actually interested in learning why you did not seize that opportunity to avoid involving yourself. It is of course off-topic, but please ask your mentor Marcus G. Daniels to stop his incessant posting about me, and the rest of you will follow. I have asked him to stop a good number of times, but it doesn't help. Maybe he will only listen to his fans. I know _I'm_ more symptathetic to people who manage not to jump out of the closet to attack me when they have something to tell me, so maybe he will listen to you as you are already of his kind and on his side? Please try, will you?
#:Erik -- "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle." -- Unknown
* Marcus G. Daniels | This is so touching, Erik! Balloons, teddy bears, frolicking in the | park! Wonderful! Let's make an after-school special, shall we?
Sure, complete with a speaking dog turd that follows people around and tries to make other people stink like hell, too.
But it really is quite amazing how you react. I couldn't invent a better image than what you provided all on your own, free of charge.
| If I wanted to vanquish intelligence, there would be dozens of targets | in comp.lang.lisp, and you wouldn't be my first choice.
*laugh* Is that really the best your little turd brain can do? HAHA!
I _am_ your first choice, you pathetic little shit! I'm obviously all you've got. You are absolutely nothing without me to attack, and you do _nothing_ else, here. I'm your raison d'etre. Without me to post about, you would vanish like a dog's fart. You already give me so much credit for being the next strongest force in this newsgroup that I think you should realize that the only reason you're the number one force, of the evil and destructive kind in your case, is that you have me to work so hard to put down. But you're the winner, bar none, in the contest of being the worst asshole to post to comp.lang.lisp in its entire existence. The reason: I scare idiots off; you make them come here and join your vendetta against me.
| I do admit, however, that my contempt for your abusive behavior is | virtually bottomless.
I know, it is from lowest rungs of hell that you keep posting, too. I sincerely hope that is where you _stay_ when you make this planet a better place, because you certainly will never understand what an evil creep you are while you are alive. I really hope you terrorize some people in your surroundings, too, so somebody will off you soon and send you _home_. Let me know who, and I'll send them flowers. Hell, why not set up a Marcus G. Daniels' Memorial Fund for scholarships to computer science students who want to learn Common Lisp and have the money sit in escrow pending your notarized death certificate. I need to place almost USD 15K in some charity before the end of the year for tax reasons, anyway, so maybe encouraging someone to get rid of you and learn Common Lisp at the same time would be a great combo package!
You don't really have contempt for my "abusive behavior", though. You need it to keep your moral upper hand and to keep posting your shit so your little fan club can have somebody they can feel better than. For what would a Marcus G. Daniels do without me to feel contempt for? Oh, I do notice that you carefully craft your wording to be contempt for my _behavior_, now, instead of repeating that braindamaged honesty to say you disrespect _me_, but you need to contradict it, you see, to make a difference.
You deserve _everything_ you get from me, and twice that. Of course you realize that as you have taken it upon you to keep posting shit about me, attacking out of the blue, you _gave_ me the right to deal with you exactly as I please. If you don't like it, well, _doh_, you can just quit your attacking out of the blue. I'm nice and respectful to you compared to what you do me. In fact, I still respect _you_ as a human being enough to hope that you will some day realize what you have done, up to and including understanding just how much you told me and the rest of the world about yourself with your reaction to the park metaphor. _You_ have crossed every line I have _left_ to cross when it comes to you, but I do not consider evil and stupidity as _important_ enough to remember, so if you come to and start to behave like a human being, I won't hold your past against you. There are lots of people out there who have been really mean to me after having been worked up to a frenzy by a disrespectful dickhead like you, hey, it probably was you!, who know that I do accept an apology and an about-face. (Provided they don't keep it up, of course.) Even an evil son of a bitch like you could quit what you do and see that I no longer think of you, say anything about you, or hold you responsible for the people you have attracted and encouraged here up until now.
It's up to you to start to behave if you don't want more "abuse", or as I prefer to call it: Due response to evil. I think this is fair. Your mode of thinking is one of life-long disrespect and revenge and hatred, but even such a insanely demented anti-justice attitude can be altered by the person holding it. Try it. You'll be surprised. Hell, you'll surprise _everyone_ if you suddenly stop your evil.
Until then, of course, you're just a contempt-filled douchebag who must accept what comes to you as long as you keep up your hostility. That's life for a Marcus G. Daniels. And you must _like_ it since you don't do anything else or anything about it, right?
#:Erik -- "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle." -- Unknown
* George Aksyonov <gask...@aol.com> | Indeed. | I wonder whether Mr NAGGUM attacks his cat as badly as he attacks | humans. | | Perhaps that is why he has CAT and no human who cares for him.
Please stop doing this in your messages. Please discuss lisp. Stop these foolish and rude outbursts.
Do the above three lines sound anything familiar to you?
_Why_ do you choose to do what you do?
What are _you_ like in real life? Do you attack people on the street because you have read ugly things about them in the newspaper? I can assume you are that kind of person, because you just gave me the right to assume such things about you. Do you understand this? Or does somebody else have to tell you to behave because you look first and foremost on _who_ says something before you listen to them? Does that mean, say, that you attack only black people on the street if you read ugly things about them? Or does it mean that you regret what you did and would like to apologize for going completely overboard? Again, you have a choice. I suggest you take it and start to _think_ about what you are doing here and why you acted the way you do.
#:Erik -- "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle." -- Unknown
* hai...@honolulu.ilog.fr | Now that's funny! Your cat has been brought to the neurology ward, | whereas you are still posting to comp.lang.lisp!
And we welcome Bruno Haible to the show! Please feel free to chip in with your special contributions any time you like, old friend.
#:Erik -- "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle." -- Unknown
* Marcus G. Daniels | Maybe if we all chip-in we could build you a statue?
You already have, and it's the statue you are attacking, not me.
#:Erik -- "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle." -- Unknown
On 12 Dec 2000 21:52:33 +0100, hai...@honolulu.ilog.fr wrote:
>Erik Naggum wrote:
>> Sorry for being soft on you tonight. My cat has been hospitalized. >Now that's funny! Your cat has been brought to the neurology ward, >whereas you are still posting to comp.lang.lisp!
Nah ! Eric is in the neurology ward. His cat is posting for him.
You have been invited to try something other than disrespect about a 100 times. You never have. I don't know what the conclusion should be, but I'm not going to change my mind about you until you change your behavior towards me. You refuse to do that. I refuse to think of you as anything but a criminally insane, thoroughly evil piece of human refuse in _response_ to your chosen actions and approach towards me. You get what you deserve, only I have been _charitable_ to one who has spent so much time and effort attacking me as you have and so much effort instigating hostility towards me from this newsgroup's more despicable readership. You have said what you "had" to say, now that your disciples have become numerous enough that you can leave. You're a miserable coward, too. If you took responsibility for what you have done, you would wish you could undo it, but you shall be denied that, no apology will be accepted unless you follow it up with actions that contradict your past behavior and what you have done shall be remembered until you choose to repent from your evil ways.
I strongly doubt that you will actually shut up and go away until you get a bullet through your head, which I strongly encourage anyone in your vicinity see to it that you receive as soon as possible. Such is the damage you have done that your death seems little reprieve as long as you do not realize what you have done. But you _have_ reached me, actually. I have not felt hatred for anyone since the feeling scared me as a child, despite an unspeakable amount of evil from a very small number of people just like you over the years. You have managed to do so fucking much to hurt me that I have the deepest hatred for you I shall probably ever feel towards any still or once living human. You are probably exceedingly proud of that, so: CONGRATULATIONS!
Now, go rot in Hell, Marcus G. Daniels, and take your fucking fan club with you. There shall no forgiveness for what you have done to me. You are and will remain a thoroughly, completely evil human being with no shred of good in the entirety of your soul. May Your God Damn You.
I doubt, in return, that this or anything else I have said has reached you. I would have hoped you had people around you who could tell you what you have done and why _your_ destructiveness has bred feelings of hostility and animosity that no horror story author could invent, but now I hope there are nobody around you at all, because the mere presence of your evil would surely destroy any unsuspecting goodness. If anyone should still be around you, I hope they make sure to cremate you so your blood and flesh and bones shall nourish nothing but flames.
#:Erik -- "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle." -- Unknown
Raffael Cavallaro <raff...@mediaone.net> writes: > These people, as is true of lurkers in general, are as great, or > greater in number than those who post.
Let me delurk for once then. It won't make any statistical difference but I just like to register a different opinion.
> Many have written me to say they are _afraid_ to post, because they > don't want to be beaten up on by Erik.
I wouldn't be afraid to post and I certainly haven't been scared away by Erik. He (along with Kent) was one of the reasons I subscribed to c.l.l. after seeing his postings regularly pop up on my Dejanews Lisp searches.
Maybe some people should just reread some of Erik's postings before hitting the follow-up button right away after spotting a politically incorrect word or sentence.
Cheers, Erik. -- "I imagine it's part of the whole black-is-white up-is-down freedom-is-slavery and ignorance-is-strength worldview that's prevalent on That Platform." -- Ben in the SDM
Raffael Cavallaro wrote: > You effectively limit the posters to c.l.l to people who either agree > with you, or have been here so long they are used to ignoring your rants. > In practice, this means you almost eliminate new participants to this > newsgroup.
I, for one, disagree. I read this newsgroup partially *because* of Mr. Naggum's well-founded and vigorous defense of himself, the newsgroup and Lisp in general.
I have not seen him speak ill of anyone without significant provocation.
Further, I have decided to methodically kill-file people who insult or attack him. So I won't be reading any more of your posts except the portions that Erik Naggum or others include in their posts.
On 13 Dec 2000 04:59:08 +0000, Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.net> replied to Marcus G. Daniels:
>* Marcus G. Daniels >| There's no reaching him. > I strongly doubt that you will actually shut up and go away until you > get a bullet through your head, which I strongly encourage anyone in > your vicinity see to it that you receive as soon as possible. > You are and will remain a thoroughly, completely evil human being with > no shred of good in the entirety of your soul. May Your God Damn You. > If anyone should still be around you, I hope they make sure to cremate > you so your blood and flesh and bones shall nourish nothing but flames.
> > You effectively limit the posters to c.l.l to people who either agree > > with you, or have been here so long they are used to ignoring your rants. > > In practice, this means you almost eliminate new participants to this > > newsgroup.
> I, for one, disagree. I read this newsgroup partially *because* of Mr. > Naggum's well-founded and vigorous defense of himself, the newsgroup and > Lisp in general.
> I have not seen him speak ill of anyone without significant provocation.
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
> Further, I have decided to methodically kill-file people who insult or > attack him. So I won't be reading any more of your posts except the > portions that Erik Naggum or others include in their posts.
Great, I'm sure they'll be happier for it. Please killfile me as well. I'll be in good company.
> On 12 Dec 2000 21:52:33 +0100, hai...@honolulu.ilog.fr wrote:
> >Erik Naggum wrote:
> >> Sorry for being soft on you tonight. My cat has been hospitalized.
> >Now that's funny! Your cat has been brought to the neurology ward, > >whereas you are still posting to comp.lang.lisp!
> Nah ! > Eric is in the neurology ward. > His cat is posting for him.
As much as I detest Erik's behavior, I think all these childish and malicious potshots are uncalled for, inappropriate and complete devoid of any constructive contribution whatsoever.
Don't you think this has gone far enough? It just as polluting as what you are attacking (and it is no longer "what" it is "who").
In article <3185587729373...@naggum.net>, Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.net> wrote: > Clean up your own act. Quit _your_ personal attacks and abuse.
Erik, only those who willfully ignore the harm your vitriol causes could ever think that asking posters, as you have, to please do the world a favor and commit suicide, is not abuse.
Only similary deluded people would conclude that my pointing out that such behavior as yours drives new posters from this newsgroup constitutes "abuse." Nor is it a "personal attack" when I, or others, point out the very real harm you do.
Simply put, your tone doesn't promote truth, though you may believe it does. It simply diminishes the usefullness of this newsgroup to many others, by preventing them from ever posting.
* Raffael Cavallaro | Erik, only those who willfully ignore the harm your vitriol causes | could ever think that asking posters, as you have, to please do the | world a favor and commit suicide, is not abuse.
Why on earth are you so _incredibly_ obsessing about that? What do you want? As far as you go ranting and raving, there's even less likelihood that you will ever stop ranting and raving no matter what _anyone_ does, and you have certainly never said anything at all that could be interpreted as opening for any action that _would_ appease you. You may not have noticed it, but I do that _all_ the time, and you people who keep attacking me _never_ do it. Even when you are asked point-blank, you don't actually give answers that can be used for anything at all. This is very, very indicative of how you think and why there is no _point_ in even trying to listen to what you keep ranting and raving about. Please understand this and do something differently that might actually convey a desire to _stop_ your insane, obsessive hostility. Unless, of course, you don't desire that at all, which is what everybody but you hostility freaks already suspect.
| Nor is it a "personal attack" when I, or others, point out the very | real harm you do.
No, of course not. Your halo protects you from all criticism.
| Simply put, your tone doesn't promote truth, though you may believe it | does.
I'll take that as sound advice from someone who really knows.
| It simply diminishes the usefullness of this newsgroup to many others, | by preventing them from ever posting.
When you realize that this applies to you even more than it does to me, you _may_ have something worthwhile to tell me, because then you will already have changed _your_ ways in order to achieve some goals that do not consist purely of destruction, as is evident now. People who only seek to destroy must be ignored, lest they succeed, like Marcus G. Daniels, who made it very, very hard for himself to be ignored, very different from your most recent fan club members.
#:Erik -- The United States of America, soon a Bush league world power. Yeee-haw!