On Jul 20, 12:48 am, Kelly Miller <
fkellymil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've carefully read several web page "guides", searched the Internet, and reviewed the posts in this group -- I just can't get SLIME to work! I'm about 12 hours into trying and not making any progress.
...
> As to getting SLIME working with CLISP 2.48 I've tried everything, multiple approaches, conflicting approachs, logical and illogical approaches, with and without quicklisp, with EMACS and XEmacs, different LISP versions. NOTHING seems to work!!!
Kelly,
It took me about four years to get SLIME to work on Windows. When I
figured it out (which I did eventually) I found that EMACS and I did
not get along, so I quietly divorced her.
I can think of about five different development environments off-hand.
People tend to have vicious flame wars over this issue. EMACS might be
the most popular CL environment, but there's plenty of dissent. I can
tell you want works for me, as a CL amateur. If I were a professional
Lisp developer, there's a good chance I would use EMACS, or Allegro,
or LispWorks, or maybe Corman, but I'm not a professional CL
developer.
I have found that vi (VIM) and the shell work best for me. This is
particularly true for CL, which has awesome tools built into the
language (trace, dribble, step, disassemble, time, and so on).
I might add that have a full time IT job as a Database Manager, use
Perl, Java, SQLite, PostgreSQL, LaTeX, and similar tools, and that the
shell-VIM combination works well for all these technologies, so
essentially I'm bending CL to fit in with the way I work, rather than
bending myself to fit in with the way CL works.
Before you devote substantial time to EMACS/SLIME, I recommend that
you give a lot of thought to whether EMACS will work for you.
CC.