Message from discussion
ANNC: qooxlisp 0.1: Driving Miss qooxdoo (from Common Lisp)
Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!87.79.20.105.MISMATCH!news.netcologne.de!ramfeed1.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Message-Id: <4830686.Dx1VlcvoiG@PointedEars.de>
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...@web.de>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <c...@PointedEars.de>
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:46:34 +0200
User-Agent: KNode/4.4.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Subject: Re: ANNC: qooxlisp 0.1: Driving Miss qooxdoo (from Common Lisp)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript,comp.lang.lisp
References: <4c02a533$0$22551$607ed4bc@cv.net> <34887a61-d30b-4b1f-9f71-cd6a44930cd5@q36g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <4c02be0c$0$21869$607ed4bc@cv.net> <380c6e3a-3e0a-4818-91d5-57a90a6d8702@23g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <4c0327c4$0$4979$607ed4bc@cv.net> <6967b783-12d7-44d2-9f93-8527f6ed9689@6g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <4c03dfac$0$32312$607ed4bc@cv.net>
Followup-To: comp.lang.javascript
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 57
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 May 2010 19:46:34 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4aa2f019.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=Pj@oiF0<9:Tf8j24CD<3lPMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[A8==4;>FRMZDZm8W4\YJN\T<8F<]0D<`YU5BG_hjh42V>ZF;m4];Q0X
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Kenneth Tilton wrote:
> David Mark wrote:
>> On May 30, 11:06 pm, Kenny <kentil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think it was a breakdown in parallel universes. In mine qooxdoo works
>>> brilliantly.
>>
>> Based on what evidence? I'm guessing you tried it in a handful of
>> browsers you had handy and figured if it appeared to work in those, it
>> must be "brilliant". Did it ever occur to you that the authors of
>> qooxdoo tried the same browsers before you and inserted lots of hacks
>> and sniffs to make them appear to work? What do you think will happen
>> in anything older, newer or unknown to the authors?
>
> I'll lose 0.01% of my market for a week until the ten full-time
> engineers paid to work on qooxdoo patch it?
,-[qooxdoo-1.1-sdk/framework/source/class/qx/Bootstrap.js:554]
|
| getClass : function(value)
| {
| var classString = Object.prototype.toString.call(value);
| return (
| qx.Bootstrap.__classToTypeMap[classString] ||
| classString.slice(8, -1)
| );
| },
,-[ibid.:554]
|
| isString : function(value)
| {
| // Added "value !== null" because IE throws an exception "Object
| // expected"
| // by executing "value instanceof Array" if value is a DOM element that
| // doesn't exist. It seems that there is a internal different between a
| // JavaScript null and a null returned from calling DOM.
| // e.q. by document.getElementById("ReturnedNull").
| return (
| value !== null && (
| typeof value === "string" ||
| qx.Bootstrap.getClass(value) == "String" ||
| value instanceof String ||
| (!!value && !!value.$$isString))
| );
| },
This alone proves that qooxdoo is junk as its authors are completely
clueless. Get over it.
PointedEars
--
Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people
who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not
the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript.
-- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300d...@news.demon.co.uk>