System.setProperty("java.class.path","foo")
The reason for wanting to try is URLClassLoader will not physically
reread a class file if it is in the classpath. See
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/browse_thread/thread/793a9146df18365a/ceaa154348f6f271#ceaa154348f6f271
Create a URLClassLoader with a url that are *not* in the parent
classloaders url's.
Arne
so just do:
URL[] url={new URL("file://foo")};
URLClassLoader laoder=new URLClassLoader(url);
?
I have a little demo example I often use to illustrate
(subdir test is not in classpath of program).
Arne
===============================
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
public class DoubleDynmaic {
private static void dynno(int n) {
(new File("test")).mkdir();
try {
OutputStream os = new FileOutputStream("test/Test.java");
PrintStream ps = new PrintStream(os);
ps.println("public class Test {");
ps.println(" public Test() {");
ps.println(" System.out.println(" + n + ");");
ps.println(" }");
ps.println("}");
ps.close();
os.close();
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("javac -d test
test/Test.java").waitFor();
URL[] url = new URL[1];
url[0] = new URL("file:test/");
URLClassLoader cl = new URLClassLoader(url);
Class.forName("Test", true, cl).newInstance();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
dynno(i);
}
}
}
You posted this in the original thread but as noted in the linked to
thread almost all the classes I am dealing with *WILL* be in the
classpath.... so the question remains if I do the code in my previous
post will it now load from the class path or from "foo".
Perhaps google ate my previous response.... but as I said several
places (including the linked to thread) almost all my classes *WILL*
be in the classpath... btw as mentioned in an other thread your demo
doesn't quite work once divorced from the code to rewrite the class
(see orginial thread)... so the question remains does the code above
load from "foo" or from the classpath when I do loader.loadClass(...)
If the class get loaded by the parent classloader because it is
in the apps general classpath, then you can (as far as I know)
neither get it unloaded or reloaded.
You need to get those classes of the classpath.
Arne
Since this is for a commercial unit testing product this is not
possible in practice (it is not safe to make assumptions about where
people place things). Some one off line suggested forking a process
to do it.... if I can't find a ClassLoader based solution I will have
to do that but it is down right a) not portable b) evil
Changing the class path after the fact isn't going to help either.
--
Daniel Pitts' Tech Blog: <http://virtualinfinity.net/wordpress/>
It's all about making reasonable assumptions. It is reasonable to
assume that you can have a degree of control the environment/context in
which your application starts up. Document the fact that the code to be
tested can't be in the same path as your product.
Also, you seem to make a big deal about this code being "commercial".
This rule applies for any publicly distributed product, whether
commercial or otherwise.
Honestly, I think you're going down the wrong road with this. Have you
looked at other existing test frameworks? What is yours going to offer
that, say, JUnit doesn't?
>Is it possible for a java app to change it's classpath at runtime
yes but it requires firing up a new classloader.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/classloader.html
--
Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
The Java Glossary
http://mindprod.com
You do not have any control over where people put their stuff,
but you have control over your stuff.
If the only thing in classpath is your jar file, then you can
create your own classloader for their stuff and unload and reload
as needed.
Arne