Introduction to the Spring Framework in NetBeans IDE
Additya
their platform might like to read the about Spring.
The Spring Framework is a popular open source application framework
that can make J2EE development easier. It consists of a container, a
framework for managing components, and a set of snap-in services
forweb user interfaces, transactions, and persistence.
The document shows you how to install the Spring Framework and run it
in NetBeans IDE.
Just go through it might be helpful to you. Its an nice explanation
of how to use Spring with the tool using Net beans.
http://www.ezdia.com/Spring_frameworks_on_Netbeans/Content.do?id=1030
Lew
> This is for all Java/J2ee [sic] programmers who want to learn Spring as
Will you stop with your multiposted spam already? It's so annoying!
This is a discussion group, not a free advertising board for your useless,
illiterate and often off-topic garbage. Stop now.
This goes double for your "Weasley" alias.
Besides, multi-posted spam discourages people from visiting your stupid site,
so it's not even smart to use it.
--
Lew
Sabine Dinis Blochberger
I think the idea is to increase the ranking by having news posts, which
google turns into html, link to them.
--
Op3racional - www.op3racional.eu
---------------------
If you're reading this, you're on Usenet
<http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm>
Patricia Shanahan
> Lew wrote:
>
>> Additya wrote:
>>> This is for all Java/J2ee [sic] programmers who want to learn Spring as
>> Will you stop with your multiposted spam already? It's so annoying!
>>
>> This is a discussion group, not a free advertising board for your useless,
>> illiterate and often off-topic garbage. Stop now.
>>
>> This goes double for your "Weasley" alias.
>>
>> Besides, multi-posted spam discourages people from visiting your stupid site,
>> so it's not even smart to use it.
>
> I think the idea is to increase the ranking by having news posts, which
> google turns into html, link to them.
>
I usually resist the temptation to say this, but sometimes I think
people have not thought this through.
*Any* response that generates a direct or indirect reference to an
article increases the PageRank of the corresponding HTML, which in turn
increases the PageRank of any web site it references. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank
If you want to frustrate spammers, the uniquely best thing to do is
absolutely nothing. Any other action, including posting articles
pointing out that they are spammers, positively helps them.
Patricia
John B. Matthews
Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org> wrote:
> Sabine Dinis Blochberger wrote:
> > Lew wrote:
> >
> >> Additya wrote:
> >>> This is for all Java/J2ee [sic] programmers who want to learn
> >> Will you stop with your multiposted spam already? It's so
> >> annoying!
> >>
> >> This is a discussion group, not a free advertising board for your
> >> useless, illiterate and often off-topic garbage. Stop now.
> >>
> >> This goes double for your "Weasley" alias.
> >>
> >> Besides, multi-posted spam discourages people from visiting your
> >> stupid site, so it's not even smart to use it.
> >
> > I think the idea is to increase the ranking by having news posts,
> > which google turns into html, link to them.
>
> I usually resist the temptation to say this, but sometimes I think
> people have not thought this through.
I value your insight on this.
> *Any* response that generates a direct or indirect reference to an
> article increases the PageRank of the corresponding HTML, which in turn
> increases the PageRank of any web site it references. See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank
I'm having trouble seeing how a response that elides or obfuscates the
villain's link contributes to the link's page rank.
> If you want to frustrate spammers, the uniquely best thing to do is
> absolutely nothing. Any other action, including posting articles
> pointing out that they are spammers, positively helps them.
I'd hoped to mitigate this by providing a direct link for any subsequent
discussion. I typically do something like this to find the original
article that was hijacked by the scoundrel:
curl "http://www.spam.invalid/bogus.html" | grep "http://www"
The miscreant gets a page hit, but no agent information, no published
link, and no javascript interpretation. Sadly, I neglected this thread
earlier:
<http://netbeans.org/kb/55/quickstart-spring.html>
--
John B. Matthews
trashgod at gmail dot com
<http://sites.google.com/site/drjohnbmatthews>
Patricia Shanahan
This is, of course, based on my understanding of how PageRank works.
According to the Wikipedia page, "The PageRank of a page is defined
recursively and depends on the number and PageRank metric of all pages
that link to it ("incoming links"). A page that is linked to by many
pages with high PageRank receives a high rank itself. If there are no
links to a web page there is no support for that page."
Various newsgroup archives, including Google's, contain the original
article, with the unmangled link. Anything that links to that base
article, including archived HTML representations of other newsgroup
articles that reference the base article, increase the rank of pages
representing the base article. The rank of the page the spammer wants to
promote is based on the rank of pages that reference it, as well as the
number.
In my opinion, replying with a mangled link is significantly less bad
than quoting the actual link, because it avoids adding to the number of
pages that reference the page that is being promoted. It is worse than
doing nothing, because it adds to the rank of pages that do contain the
link.
Ignoring spam, on the other hand, is absolutely guaranteed to frustrate
the spammer, regardless of whether the intent is to make trouble or to
promote a page.
Patricia
Arne Vajhøj
Not to mention the fact that hardcore spammers does not read the
newsgroups they spam, so they do not see the replies.
Ooops. Now I contributed as well. :-(
Arne
Sabine Dinis Blochberger
I said this in the past - sometimes it's not clear whether a link is
legitimate, and someone as diligient as Lew pointing out that it's not
saves me and many people the trouble of checking it out.
And I don't think these spammers or bot care either way, they just dump
their "articles".