Newsgroups: comp.lang.haskell
From: Adrian Hey <a...@NoSpicedHam.iee.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:45:44 +0100
Local: Thurs, Sep 24 2009 5:45 am
Subject: Re: whither operational semantics?
Hello Raould
raould wrote: I think the problem with ambiguity wrt space behaviour of Haskell >> Hmm - you've piqued my curiosity - is there something specific about >> Haskell's semantics that bothers you? > i'm not clueful enough to give a concrete example, but have seen programs isn't so much with laziness. If all Haskell implementations were truely lazy then they should all use the same fully determined reduction order (normal order reduction). Laziness induced space leaks could be nailed using explicit seqs in the program source. The problem is that normal order reduction can be inefficient, so Regards You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||