The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
From: Vityok <bob...@ua.fm>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:52:12 -0700
Local: Tues, Jun 12 2007 2:52 am
Subject: Re: Concurrent GC: a good thing?
Jon Harrop :
> Daniel C. Wang wrote: It seems to me, that marshalling can be worked around by implementing > > So long as the two threads don't share any common mutable state. I think > > two separate processes with their own single-threaded GC will always be > > more efficient than a concurrent GC running two threads. The general > > case of GCing concurrent threads that share mutable state is > > fundamentally more difficult than having two threads that share no state > > with separate GCs. > So concurrent GC makes communication cheaper at the expense of everything specific serializer/deserializer functions for data structures being processed. Thanks to the binary I/O API of the ExtLib[1], I was able to reduce [1] http://ocaml-lib.sourceforge.net/doc/IO.html With best regards, You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||