Message from discussion how to declare doubles in f95
From: glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Subject: Re: how to declare doubles in f95
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <1iubhot.647zfrly48lqNemail@example.com>
X-Trace: naig.caltech.edu 1233288937 19906 184.108.40.206 (30 Jan 2009 04:15:37 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.9.3-20080326 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.24ugcs1 (i686))
X-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:15:50 CST (news.uchicago.edu)
Richard Maine <nos...@see.signature> wrote:
> Larry Gates <la...@example.invalid> wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:42:32 -0800 (PST), e p chandler wrote:
>> > integer, parameter :: dp = kind(1.0d0)
>> Is this guaranteed to give dp as opposed to qp?
> Yes. My imagination fails me in trying to come with a way
> that one might even think otherwise.
Well, if you have AUTODBL, or whatever the automatic
double option is, then it could be what otherwise would
have been quad. But I agree, that previous quad is
It is the type that you would get with a
statement, which is double precision.