The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
From: "Craig Dedo" <cd...@wi.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:11:19 -0500
Local: Wed, Apr 16 2008 9:11 am
Subject: Re: Is this standard-conforming code?
"John" <gh14...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:fu4ru9$dbi$1@aioe.org... No, it is not standard conforming. Using the name of a derived type before > Is the below code standard conforming? I have one group saying it is and > another saying it isn't. Both are very knowledgeable about Fortran. One > compiler compiles with no errors, but another flags an error. Of course, you > can always move the "real :: z(t%n)" below the "type (tt) :: t" to avoid any > problem, but I am concerned about the order shown. > Thanks, it is defined explicitly violates the rules in section 5.1.1.1 of Fortran 2003. Here is the relevant text: [Begin quote] Where a data entity id declared explicitly using the TYPE specifier, the derived There is an exception later in the paragraph for function results. > module test_module -- > implicit none > type tt > contains > real :: z(t%n) > end subroutine test_sub_1 Craig Dedo 17130 W. Burleigh Place P. O. Box 423 Brookfield, WI 53008-0423 Voice: (262) 783-5869 Fax: (262) 783-5928 Mobile: (414) 412-5869 E-mail: <cd...@wi.rr.com> or <cr...@ctdedo.com> You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||