Message from discussion
Fortran Myths & Disinformation Wanted
From: Martin Ambuhl <mamb...@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Fortran Myths & Disinformation Wanted
Date: 1999/02/06
Message-ID: <36BC008F.6CF45630@earthlink.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 441300092
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <36B9B8FF.4E34BF22@mixcom.com> <36BA1282.41EA5CB3@earthlink.net> <87679g96ye.fsf@bglbv.my-dejanews.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-ELN-Date: 6 Feb 1999 08:42:51 GMT
X-ELN-Insert-Date: Sat Feb 6 00:45:23 1999
Organization: Nocturnal Aviation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
bg...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> And is this thread at all about squealing? I thought it was about
> identifying common misconceptions to be debunked in an information
> campaign. There is no reason the supporters of C and Cobol couldn't
> do the same, to the benefit of us all.
My point was that I have been programming in Fortran for over 30 years
and have never heard a number of these "common misconceptions." They
are not "common". There does seem to be some sort of paranoia in this
newsgroup. In the other comp.lang.* newsgroups I very rarely see
complaints about others bad-mouthing their languages. This form of
whining seems largely a property of comp.lang.fortran. Neither do the
anti-C postings in comp.lang.fortran have any parallel of anti-Fortran
postings in comp.lang.c. It is time for us Fortran programmers to grow
up, stop whining, and write code.
--
Martin Ambuhl (mamb...@earthlink.net)
Note: mamb...@tiac.net will soon be inactive