Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion gfortran/g95 differences
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Luka Djigas  
View profile  
 More options Mar 15 2010, 3:57 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
From: Luka Djigas <ldigas@___gmail___.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:57:13 +0100
Local: Mon, Mar 15 2010 3:57 pm
Subject: Re: gfortran/g95 differences

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:17:17 -0700 (PDT), Gabor <g...@szfki.hu> wrote:
>On Mar 15, 7:04 pm, Jason Blevins <jrble...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:
>> On 2010-03-15, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote:

>> > Regarding the implementation status of Fortran 2003 and Fortran 2008
>> > features, see ACM SIGPLAN Fortran Forum
>> > (http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1667140.1667145) - or slightly older at
>> >http://fortranwiki.org/fortran/show/Fortran+2003+status

>> This was a good opportunity to update this table--something I've been
>> meaning to do since December:

>> http://fortranwiki.org/fortran/show/Fortran+2003+status

>> I was happy to update quite a few entries thanks to your continued
>> hard work on gfortran, and that of many others!

>> --
>> Jason Blevins
>> Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Economics, Duke Universityhttp://jblevins.org/

>This is a really useful table !

Indeed.

fortranwiki is coming along nicely (looking at the "recently" page, I see Jason is doing his bit
above and beyond the call of duty !!)
The last time I visited it, I thought it was rather ascetic, and that it would never live.
But now, I'm pleasantly suprised it is not so. Will definitely be visiting it more in the future.

One suggestion though. It is purely a esthetic issue, but wouldn't it maybe be a good idea, if the
cells in the table which contain "Y" be colored green, and the ones "N" red (or whatever
combination). Simply as to provide a more easier to look at viewpoint. One easily gets lost in the
columns/rows. (the thing that fortran drastically needs is visuality in its image).

-- Luka

>Could someone add a column for the Portland Fortran compiler ?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.