Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.fortran
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Is this legal?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Salvatore  
View profile  
 More options May 31 2008, 12:40 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
From: Salvatore <sfilipp...@uniroma2.it>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 09:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 31 2008 12:40 pm
Subject: Re: Is this legal?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 30 Mag, 20:12, Craig Powers <craig.pow...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> Salvatore wrote:
> > On 30 Mag, 08:40, robert.corb...@sun.com wrote:
> >> On May 29, 7:07 am, Salvatore <sfilipp...@uniroma2.it> wrote:

> >>> Before someone asks, the error is about the renaming of the specific
> >>> versions of foobar
> >>> as in
> >>> use foo_mod, protect => s_foobar
> >> Can you provide the text of the error message?

> >> Bob Corbett

> > Actually the culprit is gfortran, the error message is
> > Error: Name 'foobar' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to 'foobar' from
> > module 's_foo_mod'

> > At first I thought it was about the renaming, but it seems to be
> > something more fundamental; anyway there is nothing ambiguous in this
> > example (at least, nothing that I can see, and Richard Maine seems to
> > think the same).

> Which version of gfortran?  I know that there have been some hiccups
> with handling ambiguity (or lack of some) properly, so you may have run
> into a bug which was fixed in 4.3 or newer.

It's in both 4.3.0 and in the development snapshot. The issue has
already been notifed to the GCC/gfortran crew.
Salvatore

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google