Received: by 10.68.226.10 with SMTP id ro10mr2481124pbc.6.1328199162272;
        Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Path: lh20ni252664pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Anton Letnes <paul.anton.let...@nospam.gmail.kthxbai.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: GCC/gfortran 4.7.0 release approaching - request for testing
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:12:42 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <jgeclp$ntk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9ovg90Fle7U1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <9ovipfFdf2U1@mid.individual.net> <9ovpmbFeq1U1@mid.uni-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:12:41 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3Qrvi2j7JUHotQQ1Yivjxw";
	logging-data="24500"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+3h+CT5qNq7JB0SvScU6/fjQki8eG/U4I="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To: <9ovpmbFeq1U1@mid.uni-berlin.de>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f+Cn5wme3Ui/WlYW1JC5XKWl3EQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


> As a longer plan, one could add some kind of parallelization, supported by
> some flag (-fdo-concurrent=...) and make use of this information for
> autoparallelization and OpenMP-based parallelization. However, as it is
> unclear how it should be done and as manual "!OMP$ do" tagging works, it
> has a low priority.

Out of casual curiosity: are there ever "safe choices" that would always 
work for the OpenMP statements private(a) shared(b) and so forth? 
Because I assume that the -fdo-concurrent=openmp option would then have 
to set these "automagically"?

Paul