Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion GCC/gfortran 4.7.0 release approaching - request for testing
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Paul Anton Letnes  
View profile  
 More options Feb 2 2012, 11:12 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
From: Paul Anton Letnes <paul.anton.let...@nospam.gmail.kthxbai.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:12:42 +0100
Local: Thurs, Feb 2 2012 11:12 am
Subject: Re: GCC/gfortran 4.7.0 release approaching - request for testing

> As a longer plan, one could add some kind of parallelization, supported by
> some flag (-fdo-concurrent=...) and make use of this information for
> autoparallelization and OpenMP-based parallelization. However, as it is
> unclear how it should be done and as manual "!OMP$ do" tagging works, it
> has a low priority.

Out of casual curiosity: are there ever "safe choices" that would always
work for the OpenMP statements private(a) shared(b) and so forth?
Because I assume that the -fdo-concurrent=openmp option would then have
to set these "automagically"?

Paul


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.