glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:Likely the only reason the standard doesn't say it is archaic is because
> The standard has it under
> "Specific names for standard intrinsic functions"
> Doesn't say anything about archaic.
> There is very little reason to use it, but it is still standard.
the standard doesn't say such things at all. There was a category of
deprecated features once proposed for f90, but it got dropped as too
Any recommendation about whether something should be avoided as archaic
I personally consider things like DCOS to be archaic, and I recommend
That puts it in the category of things whose utility is so low that I
If there ever actually was a reason to pass a specific intrinsic as an
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.