Message from discussion procedure as optional argument?
Received: by 10.68.241.7 with SMTP id we7mr1904479pbc.4.1338466496131;
Thu, 31 May 2012 05:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply)
Subject: Re: procedure as optional argument?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:14:55 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Multivax C&R
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Trace: online.de 1338466495 4351 126.96.36.199 (31 May 2012 12:14:55 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:14:55 +0000 (UTC)
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Arjen Markus <arjen.markus...@gmail.com> writes:
> What compiler are you using? Most seem to support at least these aspects
> of Fortran 2003.
I'm using the DEC/Compaq/HP compiler on VMS. It is full F95, but
nothing beyond that. It is several years old (but has been good
enough). I'm not sure if there is a newer version which supports more
features. However, I try to aim for the most recent standard which is
reasonably well supported. I seem to recall reading recently that IBM
has a complete F2003 compiler on AIX, but that is one of very few,