Received: by 10.224.27.14 with SMTP id g14mr6999076qac.1.1347332988111;
        Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.180.41 with SMTP id i29mr1980479yhm.4.1347332988043; Mon,
 10 Sep 2012 20:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: da15ni3445qab.0!nntp.google.com!v8no61541qap.0!postnews.google.com!f6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 20:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=97.104.37.48; posting-account=vqCYcQoAAAC8PtUrH4O0uoPF3ID_IZ51
NNTP-Posting-Host: 97.104.37.48
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <a5360efa-9d5e-4e70-bbb7-b0c956a143c4@f6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Intrinsic function for dp vs sp?
From: jski <john.chludzin...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 03:09:48 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Searching on the web I found some sites that show cos() for sp and
dcos() for dp.  The GNU Fortran site seems to indicate that dcos() is
deprecated ("archaic")?  Are there different calls for sp vs. dp for
the intrinsic functions?

---John