Received: by 10.68.236.170 with SMTP id uv10mr13515127pbc.4.1333551998018;
        Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni17948pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: hwfw...@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: forrth and abstraction
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <19781374.74.1333551608217.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncc41>
References: <e1e81491-03bd-43d6-a6de-890434e5b352@px4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <jkg74c$o0i$1@speranza.aioe.org> <74cb20c2-2f90-4958-b258-c248f28a0c5b@z17g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
 <d57e8e23-dc17-4ac1-b558-9ecb90f8e58d@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.211.152.81
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1333551997 16774 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2012 15:06:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:06:37 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <d57e8e23-dc17-4ac1-b558-9ecb90f8e58d@n19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=72.211.152.81;
 posting-account=6GCGIQoAAAAyO8IjR_VTwqiqLwx0Q_G8
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:45:49 AM UTC-7, Hugh Aguilar wrote:
> I still believe that it is more likely that you will
> eventually post some Forth code on comp.lang.forth than the Passanniti/
> Rather dynamic duo.
> 
Passanniti won't blow smoke up your ass (I can only speak figuratively), so c.l.f is a good place to get an honest critique.