Received: by 10.224.223.84 with SMTP id ij20mr14272438qab.5.1349115597576;
        Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.93.132 with SMTP id cu4mr1519551vdb.14.1349115597511; Mon,
 01 Oct 2012 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e10ni152738182qan.0!nntp.google.com!l8no20348781qao.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <74KdnZjtKNsaK_TNnZ2dnUVZ8q-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=178.27.34.143;
 posting-account=o1zNBwoAAABP2KiH5g6nPQp_sYWidVdt
NNTP-Posting-Host: 178.27.34.143
References: <32e7fd8d-7494-4010-a9d5-d9673a3df831@googlegroups.com> <74KdnZjtKNsaK_TNnZ2dnUVZ8q-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <eb16fc4b-b98f-48a9-a937-31d0ce1822ae@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: GA144 polyForth
From: Howerd <howe...@yahoo.co.uk>
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:19:57 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Monday, October 1, 2012 5:28:08 PM UTC+2, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Howerd <how....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > IIRC a 16 MHx Novix takes less than 1 second for this, and most 8
> 
>   bit processors are some tens of seconds.
> 
> 
> 
> Erm, 16MHz?  IIRC we never got it running past 6.  :-)
> 
> 
> 
> Andrew.

Hi Andrew,

Maybe it was 8 MHz - but this was in the 1990's at MPE, not 1980's at COMSOL, so maybe they were faster chips?

Best regards,
Howerd