Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion why forth over lisp?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Alex McDonald  
View profile  
 More options Aug 21 2010, 5:51 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth, comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.scheme, comp.lang.postscript
From: Alex McDonald <b...@rivadpm.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 14:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Aug 21 2010 5:51 pm
Subject: Re: why forth over lisp?
On 21 Aug, 22:28, toby <t...@telegraphics.com.au> wrote:

> On Aug 21, 11:30 am, John Passaniti <john.passan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Aug 21, 3:17 am, Standish P <stnd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > All virtual machines, lisp, java etc use stack, so forth has no
> > > monopoly over that.

> > False.  The virtual machines in Lua, Python, Perl 6, and others are
> > not stack-based.

> Actually Lua's VM is heavily stack oriented, if I recall correctly
> from experiences embedding it in C/C++.

The LUA version 5 VM has 250 "registers" which are indices into the
current stack frame. None of the 38 opcodes has any stack-like
operations; http://luaforge.net/docman/view.php/83/98/ANoFrillsIntroToLua51VMInst...

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.