Received: by 10.224.78.209 with SMTP id m17mr14691832qak.3.1349786240294; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:37:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.42 with SMTP id cj10mr39266vdb.0.1349786240241; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: r17ni19qap.0!nntp.google.com!l8no32810072qao.0!postnews.google.com!y6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 05:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.152.31.97; posting-account=-SW8SwkAAAD1SnMODqHHlviZYvMpjG6L NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.152.31.97 References: <0df89d5e-5ca6-450d-85af-2cf9027e17ac@googlegroups.com> <4381d528-f2af-4778-91eb-941e7dcaf536@googlegroups.com> <98ea4a41-aec0-4d20-b42b-b1352653e017@dr5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <8b93b4e2-b825-486d-94ec-b242b22d922b@l7g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <018a2ae9-f6be-48e3-aea7-c666222149a1@y6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: STATEless Forths From: Alex McDonald Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:37:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct 9, 5:13=A0am, Mark Wills wrote: > On Oct 9, 12:40=A0pm, Alex McDonald wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 2:09=A0am, Mark Wills wrote: > > > > I don't agree with Rod's opinion on the subject of job titles, nor > > > Hugh's on this occasion. However, I'd rather go for a beer with Hugh > > > and/or Rod any day. And that is sad. Because your clear experience, > > > knowledge, and intellect would be very very interesting and > > > stimulating. But you'd just annoy the absolute living shit out of > > > everyone, sipping your cocktails (because only the great un-washed > > > drink beer), and lecturing everyone from on high. Pretty soon the bar > > > would be empty, and you'd be happy. Content with a job well done. > > > The likelihood of leaving the bar amused, entertained, infuriated and > > delighted after a conversation with Passaniti is high. Pemberton or > > Aguilar would leave me bored while they pounded on and on and on, the > > tedium only to be relieved while they visited the toilet to return > > their rented beer. And the ability to leave in one piece after the > > inevitable disagreement is something I value highly in a drinking > > partner. I'll take a highball with Passaniti any day of the week. > > There's an oxymoron there. You can't (surely?) be delighted at being > infuriated? ;-) I see you've (re)discovered "Pemberton's Peripheral Perambulation", an algorithm for seeking out super-literalism in colloquial conversation.