Here's a recent example of bad management: [edited for
usenet readability]
---
<ayrnieu> : pause rp@ fp@ lp@ sp@ save-task ! next-task @
up! save-task @ sp! lp! fp! rp! ;
the great thing about this word is that the task changes at
UP!
to highlight that, : stop rp@ fp@ lp@ sp@ save-task !
next-task @ up! save-task @ sp! lp! fp! rp! prev-task @
sleep ;
: pause save-stacks (pause) load-stacks ; : stop save-stacks
(pause) load-stacks prev-task @ sleep ;
so it isn't even that the newly active task finishes up its
own pause -- it starts at the exact place that the previous
task was at, only exiting to a different environment. so a
task can enter PAUSE and exit from STOP
<ASau> ayrnieu: what's so wonderful? Have you discovered
Forth multitasking?
<slava> you guys suck
*** slava KICK ayrnieu #forth slava
*** slava KICK ASau #forth slava
---
There's no justifying backstory, here. Some implementor of
a non-forth language removed two people from a channel about
Forth for breaking the silence to talk about it.
#forth is broken. You are all invited to #forthcafe
Julian.