Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Cobol for MVS migration
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
The Goobers  
View profile  
 More options Nov 30 1997, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol
From: The Goobers <docdw...@erols.com>
Date: 1997/11/30
Subject: Re: Cobol for MVS migration

S Comstock wrote:

> Here we go again.

> I know everyone is pressed for time and resources, but I recommend doing a
> little training along the way.

Heresy!  It is a Well-Known Fact that if you give someone training they
will immediately jump ship to a higher-paying company because said
company is foolish enough to think that a person, trained, is more
valuable than a person, untrained... don't they know that Gratitude Is
Enough?

> [snippage]
> The result is new and revised programs being written in the style and spirit of
> COBOL 74, or even COBOL '68.

Now, repeat after me: 'The responsibility for the allocation,
co-ordination and motivation of personnel and resources towards the
accomplishment of a stated Executive goal is that of Management.'
Repeat again.

Let's look at it another way... assume that an organisation has invested
a great deal of money in the upgrading of the physical plant.  If
sufficient investment has been made then it is likely that serious
consideration will be given to upgrading the security system (new locks,
etc.) to prevent these improvement from 'walking off'.  Also consider
the common term of 'golden handcuffs', a recognised metaphor for
increasing salary/benefits to prevent human capital from *physically*
walking away.  Now, consider the investment of money in humans to
upgrade skills in order to make them more valuable to the company.
Consider how many times you have seen a corporate policy stating that an
increase in salary/benefits accompanies the successful completion of
such an upgrade (courses).

Years ago the Wall Street Journal did a story on one of the major NY
houses... I think it was Morgan Stanley or Morgan Guaranty or the like.
They hired *only* the 'unhireable'... kids with BAs in Library Science,
Art History, etc... they put these kids through two years of hell, 60 -
70 hr weeks, and turned them into *crackerjack* programmers... and then
saw said kids being hired away by the competition at double or triple
the salary.  When asked why a raise did not accompany the completion of
the course the HR representative replied 'Oh, we cannot do that... all
the money has been taken up by training.' (compare this with 'Oh, we
cannot upgrade the door-locks... all the money went into oil-paintings
to hang on the walls.')

After a few years of seeing themselves serve as Wall Street's unofficial
programming school the company finally 'wised up'... and cancelled the
program entirely.

DD


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google