Newsgroups: comp.lang.cobol, comp.lang.fortran
From: docdw...@panix.com
Date: 10 Jul 2004 07:58:05 -0400
Local: Sat, Jul 10 2004 7:58 am
Subject: Re: Dead languages?
In article <40ef1d19.87379...@news.optonline.net>,
Robert Wagner <robert.deletet...@wagner.net> wrote: This is similar to what I was taught about Ancient Greek, where order word >docdw...@panix.com wrote: >>In article <40ee18af.20703...@news.optonline.net>, >>>>In article <40edfa9c.13003...@news.optonline.net>, >>>>>>docdw...@panix.com writes: >>>>>>> 'Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres!' >>>>>>Oh dear! My high school Latin text must have had a bowdlerized >>>>>Richard is correct. Caesar actually wrote: "Gallia est omnis divisa in partes >>>>Mr Wagner, this is confusing... Mr Maine wrote 'I'd *SWEAR* I remember >>>Even more confusing is the Original Latin I remember as "Omnes Galii est divista >>What's Life without a bit of Mystery? >>>I remember it very distinctly. How many versions of Gaelic Wars >>Ahhhhh, for the Oldene Dayse... when they taught Latin quotes such as >Unlike English, where normal word order is SVO (subject, verb, object), Latin, important is very not. >My hypothesis is that high school Latin text authors rearranged words to make it >Caesar's "Gallia est omnis divisa in parte tres." and >are linguistically equivalent, are saying the same thing and are equally valid of skill; my apologies in advance for the grievous errors. I would say not *quite* so, Mr Wagner. In Caesar's quote 'Gallia' is a DD You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||