Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
From: Random832 <ran...@random.yi.org>
Date: 13 Dec 2006 00:13:59 GMT
Local: Tues, Dec 12 2006 7:13 pm
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: malloc
2006-12-12 <1165956252.845272.153...@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
goose wrote: Um... run concurrently? you mean as opposed to being in swap? Because > Barry Schwarz wrote: > <snipped> >> or the operating system terminate it. On a typical desk top system, > Not *all* typical desktops perform the same; ISTR that FreeBSD that's where the "virtual" part normally comes in. > the OS picks a process and kills
> it, so all malloc calls *always* return a pointer to memory. > I further seem to recall that this was tunable with a FreeBSD > Or else all of the conversation that I remember happened on a > goose, You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||