goose wrote:Um... run concurrently? you mean as opposed to being in swap? Because
> Barry Schwarz wrote:
>> or the operating system terminate it. On a typical desk top system,
> Not *all* typical desktops perform the same; ISTR that FreeBSD
that's where the "virtual" part normally comes in.
> the OS picks a process and kills
> it, so all malloc calls *always* return a pointer to memory.
> I further seem to recall that this was tunable with a FreeBSD
> Or else all of the conversation that I remember happened on a
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.