This is what i think, yes i know, it is all my personal
opinion, there will be error,
(i would have some feedback for find them)
but it is how i see the world now.
What is going wrong?
(a)
The increase of economy production and so the increase of
rubbish and increase of pollution are the main problem,
when resources are limited.
(ai)
The above problem generate the follow one:
[many time ago when i was young i say the below paragraph
to my cousin that not understood, i will have more lucky?]
one machine can do what 100 humans can not do, so
all the system has one over production problem;
(because machine produce more of the necessary
and without upper bound)
this generate one distribution money problem
(because money would go to few people
[the people that control machines] )
(b)
The globalisation spread [or distribute] errors;
so nobody can resolve them, because nobody know
from where they(errors) have origin.
--------------------------
For example, one food product
done of all raw materials (materie prime)
came from region X
if it is buy by the people of the same region
that product is make,
if in that product has something wrong in it,
someone can easily find the problem
using statistics
instead
if one food product
done of all raw materials (materie prime)
came from region X
if it is buy by the people of all over the world,
because of distribution, it make ignore the problem
in that food (because the % will be not enough for find
what is going wrong)
---------------------
and this is valid for all sort of problem.
For example i believe that the state of the red dragon
get out problems to all around the world that locally they can not
want resolve (eg. democracy) so export them (eg. dictatorship)
My Solutions
----
The problem (ai) could be resolve
with the division of the work: work less but work all ones.
----
The problem (a) culd have 2 solutions
a1) recycle all the products, with very little pollution
of carcinogenic substances and not much energy
even if the production is big.
a2) think one other economic model that centre on
saving all, and repair all
in all the case, cancerogenig substances (from the more danger
(eg plutonio) to the less dangers) has to be
deleted from the marked and substitute with substance
have not problem.
----
For the set of problem (b): duty on state frontier
and the market not could be other than local
[region food; national for what remain]
(and not global)
one people that born in one place has to stay in
that place, resolve the problem in that place,
and not run around all over the world (no migration)
Boun Giorno
Grazie
> Is it possible to speak here of real problems?
of course. Anything concerning the C programming language can be
discussed here.
> Do you think that not speak of problems, not see the problems,
> when the ship is sinking, is it better?
you shouldn't ignore problems with your programs.
> This is what i think, yes i know, it is all my personal
> opinion, there will be error,
> (i would have some feedback for find them)
> but it is how i see the world now.
>
> What is going wrong?
> (a)
> The increase of economy production
<snip off-topic stuff>
<snip off-topic stuff>
#yes life is off topic
I have to say, I do like the idea of increasing economy production - I
just can't work out whether you end up with more or less stuff at the
end of it.
--
Online waterways route planner | http://canalplan.eu
Plan trips, see photos, check facilities | http://canalplan.org.uk
Unless you are implementing Conway's game of "Life" in C, and have some
questions about it.
--
Kenneth Brody
No. This newsgroup is devoted to the C language; a creation of human
fiction and innovation, its constructs which are as real as the values
of an arbitrary magnetic field around your 'real' globe and imaginary
people that troll its premises.
It is therefore not suitable for any sort of "real" stuff.
Byebyenow.
Damn right it is. Have you seen a developer with half of it?