Description:
The object-oriented C++ language.
|
|
|
deducing the return type of a function call...
|
| |
I am struggling to find a way to get around having to explicitly pass a return type for the following callback scheme I am playing around with. Here is some sample code: ...template<typename T_return> struct call_base { virtual T_return execute() const = 0; ...template<typename T, typename T_memfun,... more »
|
|
|
Are all these overloads legal?
|
| |
I am trying to create a wrapper template that can forward parameters from the wrapper constructor to the wrapped object constructor. I have been having some trouble, and the only way I can even think of getting it work is to use a boatload of overloads. Here is some sample code: ...struct fubar {... more »
|
|
|
in reply to: DWORD and bool to binary
|
| |
ahso wrote: ...Will you please stop posting the same message 7 times? USENET isn't instantaneous. Just because you don't see your reply immediatly after hitting "Post", doesn't mean it didn't go through. And the comment someone else made still stands: If you're trying to port code from one environment to another, you'd better damned well... more »
|
|
|
|
