Swearing in Usenet posts

[Mr Flibble]

"Bugger, shit, fuck, shit, fucking sphincter, arsehole, up your arse, up
your cunt, fuck you sideways you fucking boring fucking whore fuck off
you cow!" -- Brian Blessed (a star)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaY7VTftPdY

/Flibble

[woodb...@gmail.com]

On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 1:56:51 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> "Bugger,

I don't think that word is swearing, but it went
down hill quickly after that.


Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - "Now you followed my teaching, conduct,
purpose, faith, patience, love, perseverance, persecutions, and
sufferings, such as happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium and
at Lystra; what persecutions I endured, and out of them all the
L-rd rescued me!" 2nd Timothy 3:10,11

http://webEbenezer.net

[Real Troll]

We should have "Sharia Law" so that all the swearing, pimping,
prostitutions, and drinking alcohol can be stopped almost immediately.

[red floyd]

On 7/11/2016 1:24 PM, woodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 1:56:51 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> "Bugger,
>
> I don't think that word is swearing, but it went
> down hill quickly after that.
>

And just where in his post did Flibble "Take the name of the Lord in
vain"?

Chill out, and don't impose your prudishness on the rest of us.

[woodb...@gmail.com]

As some have noted previously, the Bible doesn't prohibit
drinking alcohol, but it does say to not get drunk.

I don't know of any C++ software with Islamic roots.
I'm with Bach who wrote music to the glory of G-d.

http://www.theworshipcommunity.com/johann-sebastian-bach-soli-deo-gloria-to-the-glory-of-god-alone/


Brian
Ebenezer Enterprises - "The name of the L-RD is a strong tower;
The righteous runs into it and is safe." Proverbs 18:10

http://webEbenezer.net

[Scott Lurndal]

woodb...@gmail.com writes:
>On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 1:56:51 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> "Bugger,
>
>I don't think that word is swearing,

You do understand the activity to which it refers, correct?

[Scott Lurndal]

woodb...@gmail.com writes:
>On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 3:31:30 PM UTC-5, Real Troll wrote:

>I don't know of any C++ software with Islamic roots.

Can you spell A - L - G - E - B - R - A ?

See also: Al-jabr

Your willful ignorance is astounding.

[Daniel]

On Monday, July 11, 2016 at 2:56:51 PM UTC-4, Mr Flibble wrote:
> "Bugger, shit, fuck, shit, fucking sphincter, arsehole, up your arse, up
> your cunt, fuck you sideways you fucking boring fucking whore fuck off
> you cow!"
>

Lard tunderin jaysus b'y, be ye daft? None of these words are blasphemous, none, absolutely none. As the little'uns in grade school would say, "you think you're hot, but you're snot!"

Daniel

[David Brown]

There was also al-Khwārizmī, whence "algorithm". The Islamic (and
Persian before them) scholars preserved classical knowledge through the
European dark ages, improved upon it, then dragged Europe out of the
ignorance of the middle ages. Meanwhile, the "scholars" of Europe
counting angels on pin-heads and inventing new excuses to burn each
other at the stake.

But to be fair on Brian, those Islamic scholars did not use C++, even
though their work is arguably at the root of all our software.

[David Brown]

Some things are best illustrated in song:

<http://www.lspace.org/fandom/songs/hedgehogsong.html>

[bartekltg]

Not all word referring to sexual activity are swear words.
In my dictionary, bugger, verb, 5'th meaning (that one you thinking
about) is described as "taboo or _law_".
I'm quite sure lawyers aren't allowed to swear in a court.;-)


It is one of many meanings. You can use this word as 'pain in a butt'...
...
Hmm. I think I'm starting to connect dots...


bartekltg

[Daniel]

Not all uses of that word connote anal penetration, for example, the excellent
Mr Flibble is clearly being a "silly bugger". Some folks here would like to see
Brian "bugger off" whenever he feels the need to tell us about the lord.

Daniel

[Gareth Owen]

woodb...@gmail.com writes:

> I don't know of any C++ software with Islamic roots.
> I'm with Bach who wrote music to the glory of G-d.

I'm with Bach. But I'm also with Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan. The greatest
of their genius far exceeds the narrowness of your myopic world view.

[Real Troll]

On 13/07/2016 18:01, Gareth Owen wrote:
> But I'm also with Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan.

Do you also support Sharia Law?

[Mr Flibble]

Only fucktards support Sharia Law.

/Flibble

[Jerry Stuckle]

Of course, you realize that people swear because they are unable to
present their case in an intelligent manner.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstu...@attglobal.net
==================

[Real Troll]

On 14/07/2016 03:47, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Of course, you realize that people swear because they are unable to
> present their case in an intelligent manner.

So what you are suggesting is that something like in this quote could be
presented in an intelligent manner:

[Jerry Stuckle]

I'm not suggesting anything. I said what I meant. Nothing more.

[Daniel]

On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 10:47:21 PM UTC-4, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
> Of course, you realize that people swear because they are unable to
> present their case in an intelligent manner.
>

Just so. Best to make the case with pig themed "oink oink" statements.

Regards,
Daniel

[pare...@gmail.com]

@Scott Lundral,

You are the one who's coming across as WILLFUL ignorant. Sure, Al-jabr and algebra has middle-eastern, Persian, and Arabian roots and has a timeline that overlapped with the period when islam started running rampant. One has to note in that era (just as in the present) an iota of irreverence of the all-encompassing politico-religious system, especially given its self-proclaimed preeminent and perfect status backed up by the most liberal use of the sword, would mean one's neck would be immediately cut out.

To give any credit now to the islamic influence on C++ development, as opposed to the brick-by-brick development of human knowledge in general and scientific advancement in particular with lots of contributions from earlier thought including from India (thus the name Hindu numerals that included the invention of 0 (ZERO!)) and most of which was largely secular in spirit and some of which came about in Persia in spite of the most oppressive politico-religious theocracy known to mankind in the form of islam, is what is being willfully ignorant, you asshole!

[Gareth Owen]

Jude's sister, and Denis's daughter, I believe.

[Real Troll]

These members of the peace loving religion have killed nearly 84 in
France and they will kill 1000s in Turkey now they are in charge. What
will happen to NATO who have HQ in Turkey? Will Allah protect it?

[Öö Tiib]

All good and evil what is done on this planet is done by fellow humans
of ours.

The mad truck driver in France? He wasn't religious. He didn't pray,
didn't fast, drank alcohol and used drugs. Why you say he was religious?
He was highly "successful" rampage killer. That count will remain
hard to beat for some time.

The coup in Turkey is not religious. It was done by military. It
seemingly failed anyway, will be hopefully over soon. Erdogan will
likely regain control there and then kill lot more people behind
closed doors slowly than that truck driver did quickly.

NATO is surely well-protected by Allah, what question is that? Nothing
bad will happen to NATO nor its HQ in Turkey.

[Jerry Stuckle]

On 7/15/2016 9:01 PM, Öö Tiib wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 July 2016 01:34:02 UTC+3, Real Troll wrote:
>> On 14/07/2016 21:49, Gareth Owen wrote:
>>> Real Troll <real....@trolls.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 13/07/2016 18:01, Gareth Owen wrote:
>>>>> But I'm also with Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan.
>>>> Do you also support Sharia Law?
>>> Jude's sister, and Denis's daughter, I believe.
>>
>> These members of the peace loving religion have killed nearly 84 in
>> France and they will kill 1000s in Turkey now they are in charge. What
>> will happen to NATO who have HQ in Turkey? Will Allah protect it?
>
> All good and evil what is done on this planet is done by fellow humans
> of ours.
>
> The mad truck driver in France? He wasn't religious. He didn't pray,
> didn't fast, drank alcohol and used drugs. Why you say he was religious?
> He was highly "successful" rampage killer. That count will remain
> hard to beat for some time.
>

French police identified him as having ties to radical Islam. Do you
have evidence to the contrary?

[Öö Tiib]

On Saturday, 16 July 2016 05:06:56 UTC+3, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 7/15/2016 9:01 PM, Öö Tiib wrote:
> > On Saturday, 16 July 2016 01:34:02 UTC+3, Real Troll wrote:
> >> On 14/07/2016 21:49, Gareth Owen wrote:
> >>> Real Troll <real....@trolls.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> On 13/07/2016 18:01, Gareth Owen wrote:
> >>>>> But I'm also with Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan.
> >>>> Do you also support Sharia Law?
> >>> Jude's sister, and Denis's daughter, I believe.
> >>
> >> These members of the peace loving religion have killed nearly 84 in
> >> France and they will kill 1000s in Turkey now they are in charge. What
> >> will happen to NATO who have HQ in Turkey? Will Allah protect it?
> >
> > All good and evil what is done on this planet is done by fellow humans
> > of ours.
> >
> > The mad truck driver in France? He wasn't religious. He didn't pray,
> > didn't fast, drank alcohol and used drugs. Why you say he was religious?
> > He was highly "successful" rampage killer. That count will remain
> > hard to beat for some time.
> >
>
> French police identified him as having ties to radical Islam. Do you
> have evidence to the contrary?

Where is your cite about that?

What I see in internet are all such:
"*French* *prosecutors* *have* *said* *Bouhlel* *had* *no* *known* *ties*
*to* *terror* *groups*"

https://www.buzzfeed.com/tasneemnashrulla/heres-what-we-know-about-the-suspect-in-the-nice-attack?utm_term=.eoP8QMAVe#.rxPebYP1w

[Jerry Stuckle]

Virtually every news channel in the area. The report came from press
agencies.

And I said French POLICE, not prosecutors.

However, since you think the Internet is the last word in the truth (it
isn't, but some people don't understand that), try

https://www.rt.com/news/351331-nice-attacker-radical-islam/
http://www.timesofisrael.com/french-pm-nice-attacker-probably-linked-to-radical-islam/
http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/latest-from-nice-pm-calls-driver-terrorist-linked-to-radical-islam-1.2988025

All of these are several hours old and discuss how the French PM
believes he was tied to radical Islam. He wouldn't say anything like
that without some indication - and that indication would come from
police; prosecutors are not involved at this point.

And I found these and more in about 10 seconds. Why couldn't you?

[Öö Tiib]

Again wiggling aside with mumbo-jumbo about semantics? Where are your
materials about position of that French POLICE?

>
> However, since you think the Internet is the last word in the truth (it
> isn't, but some people don't understand that), try
>
> https://www.rt.com/news/351331-nice-attacker-radical-islam/
> http://www.timesofisrael.com/french-pm-nice-attacker-probably-linked-to-radical-islam/
> http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/latest-from-nice-pm-calls-driver-terrorist-linked-to-radical-islam-1.2988025
>
> All of these are several hours old and discuss how the French PM
> believes he was tied to radical Islam. He wouldn't say anything like
> that without some indication - and that indication would come from
> police; prosecutors are not involved at this point.

Where in any of these is anything about French POLICE knowing any link
to any terrorist organization?

All materials say he was hoodlum and felon, in debts, divorcing,
non-religious, short-tempered. None say anything about any ties to
radical Islam. What a politician says about what is "probable" or
"likely" or "we shall see" does not count. Guessing wrong like that
is not even lie. We all know that politicians sometimes lie with
straight face and that some such lies damage world economy. Best
recent example is perhaps George W. Bush and his WMD.

>
> And I found these and more in about 10 seconds. Why couldn't you?

I find piles of such same thing like you posted. Lot of empty words
around lack of information. It is clear that several political groups
in Europe want to blame Islam. The Arab fugitives are annoying to people
and so it is politically profitable to be against Islam. It is sure deal.
However what politicians want is irrelevant to actual reality.

[Jerry Stuckle]

Where do you think the PM got his facts? It didn't come out of thin
air, and prosecutors are not involved.

Some people are SOOO stoopid!

>>
>> However, since you think the Internet is the last word in the truth (it
>> isn't, but some people don't understand that), try
>>
>> https://www.rt.com/news/351331-nice-attacker-radical-islam/
>> http://www.timesofisrael.com/french-pm-nice-attacker-probably-linked-to-radical-islam/
>> http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/latest-from-nice-pm-calls-driver-terrorist-linked-to-radical-islam-1.2988025
>>
>> All of these are several hours old and discuss how the French PM
>> believes he was tied to radical Islam. He wouldn't say anything like
>> that without some indication - and that indication would come from
>> police; prosecutors are not involved at this point.
>
> Where in any of these is anything about French POLICE knowing any link
> to any terrorist organization?
>

Where do you think the PM got his facts? It didn't come out of thin
air, and prosecutors are not involved.

Some people are SOOO stoopid!

> All materials say he was hoodlum and felon, in debts, divorcing,
> non-religious, short-tempered. None say anything about any ties to
> radical Islam. What a politician says about what is "probable" or
> "likely" or "we shall see" does not count. Guessing wrong like that
> is not even lie. We all know that politicians sometimes lie with
> straight face and that some such lies damage world economy. Best
> recent example is perhaps George W. Bush and his WMD.
>

You didn't read any of them, did you? And in this morning's news, ISIS
has claimed he was an "ISIS soldier".

>>
>> And I found these and more in about 10 seconds. Why couldn't you?
>
> I find piles of such same thing like you posted. Lot of empty words
> around lack of information. It is clear that several political groups
> in Europe want to blame Islam. The Arab fugitives are annoying to people
> and so it is politically profitable to be against Islam. It is sure deal.
> However what politicians want is irrelevant to actual reality.
>

And your information is more accurate? ROFLMAO!

Some people are SOOO stoopid!

[Öö Tiib]

PM did say "probably" and "we shall see" on each three links you posted.
Is PM "French POLICE" that you so noisily corrected? Is PM telling about
"French POLICE"? What facts? Where is your cite?

>
> Some people are SOOO stoopid!

:D Is it self-irony?

>
> >>
> >> However, since you think the Internet is the last word in the truth (it
> >> isn't, but some people don't understand that), try
> >>
> >> https://www.rt.com/news/351331-nice-attacker-radical-islam/
> >> http://www.timesofisrael.com/french-pm-nice-attacker-probably-linked-to-radical-islam/
> >> http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/latest-from-nice-pm-calls-driver-terrorist-linked-to-radical-islam-1.2988025
> >>
> >> All of these are several hours old and discuss how the French PM
> >> believes he was tied to radical Islam. He wouldn't say anything like
> >> that without some indication - and that indication would come from
> >> police; prosecutors are not involved at this point.
> >
> > Where in any of these is anything about French POLICE knowing any link
> > to any terrorist organization?
> >
>
> Where do you think the PM got his facts? It didn't come out of thin
> air, and prosecutors are not involved.

What facts you talk about? Where is your cite?

>
> Some people are SOOO stoopid!

:D Is it self-irony?

>
> > All materials say he was hoodlum and felon, in debts, divorcing,
> > non-religious, short-tempered. None say anything about any ties to
> > radical Islam. What a politician says about what is "probable" or
> > "likely" or "we shall see" does not count. Guessing wrong like that
> > is not even lie. We all know that politicians sometimes lie with
> > straight face and that some such lies damage world economy. Best
> > recent example is perhaps George W. Bush and his WMD.
> >
>
> You didn't read any of them, did you? And in this morning's news, ISIS
> has claimed he was an "ISIS soldier".

Where? Pro-ISIS groups have been celebrating the attack a lot
(stupidly IMHO) but none has claimed responsibility of organizing it.
Yellow media? Where is the official confirmation of your "French POLICE"
that you were so noisy about?

>
> >>
> >> And I found these and more in about 10 seconds. Why couldn't you?
> >
> > I find piles of such same thing like you posted. Lot of empty words
> > around lack of information. It is clear that several political groups
> > in Europe want to blame Islam. The Arab fugitives are annoying to people
> > and so it is politically profitable to be against Islam. It is sure deal.
> > However what politicians want is irrelevant to actual reality.
> >
>
> And your information is more accurate? ROFLMAO!

My lack of any information about ties of that perpetrator with any Islamic
organization is the very same as yours and everybody else. On the contrary
everybody write that the man wasn't religious nothing to talk of radically
religious. You just suddenly pull "facts" out of nothing or gossip in yellow
press and "maybes" of politicians.

>
> Some people are SOOO stoopid!

We all know that when you have lost and have no arguments then you
declare your loss with your empty insults. However why you declare
your loss 3 times in a post? That looks too pathetic and desperate.

[Jerry Stuckle]

The links I posted - IFF you could read!

>>
>> Some people are SOOO stoopid!
>
> :D Is it self-irony?
>

For you, yes.

>>
>>> All materials say he was hoodlum and felon, in debts, divorcing,
>>> non-religious, short-tempered. None say anything about any ties to
>>> radical Islam. What a politician says about what is "probable" or
>>> "likely" or "we shall see" does not count. Guessing wrong like that
>>> is not even lie. We all know that politicians sometimes lie with
>>> straight face and that some such lies damage world economy. Best
>>> recent example is perhaps George W. Bush and his WMD.
>>>
>>
>> You didn't read any of them, did you? And in this morning's news, ISIS
>> has claimed he was an "ISIS soldier".
>
> Where? Pro-ISIS groups have been celebrating the attack a lot
> (stupidly IMHO) but none has claimed responsibility of organizing it.
> Yellow media? Where is the official confirmation of your "French POLICE"
> that you were so noisy about?
>

You should pay more attention to the news and less to the internet. Get
REAL facts.

>>
>>>>
>>>> And I found these and more in about 10 seconds. Why couldn't you?
>>>
>>> I find piles of such same thing like you posted. Lot of empty words
>>> around lack of information. It is clear that several political groups
>>> in Europe want to blame Islam. The Arab fugitives are annoying to people
>>> and so it is politically profitable to be against Islam. It is sure deal.
>>> However what politicians want is irrelevant to actual reality.
>>>
>>
>> And your information is more accurate? ROFLMAO!
>
> My lack of any information about ties of that perpetrator with any Islamic
> organization is the very same as yours and everybody else. On the contrary
> everybody write that the man wasn't religious nothing to talk of radically
> religious. You just suddenly pull "facts" out of nothing or gossip in yellow
> press and "maybes" of politicians.
>

You claimed that it wasn't an ISIS attack. And now you're trying to
backpedal. How like a troll.

And I think the PM of France knows a LOT MORE about the situation than
you do.

>>
>> Some people are SOOO stoopid!
>
> We all know that when you have lost and have no arguments then you
> declare your loss with your empty insults. However why you declare
> your loss 3 times in a post? That looks too pathetic and desperate.
>

Not at all. You are just too stoopid to see the real facts. You think
everything on the internet is the truth. And you believe everything you
read.

Here's a suggestion. Stand up, take a load off your brain, and look at
REAL NEWS.