Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Another proof that C++ and C are bad
9 views
Skip to first unread message
Ramine
Dec 27, 2015, 9:44:03 PM12/27/15
to
Hello.....
You have to understand me Sir and Madam, you have seen
me explaining to you why C++ and C are bad for realtime
safety critical systems, here is another proof that
makes C++ and C not suitable for realtime safety critical systems,
The c++11 have a weak software memory model and that`s not acceptable
for safety critical systems, simply because with this weak spftware
memory model you risk more , so the weak software memory model doesn`t
follow the spirit of Ada and Delphi and FreePascal, so this is why
FreePascal and Delphi follows the Strong memory model of the x86
architecture on an x86 architecture and that simplify the reasonning
about synchronization algorithms etc and that`s good for Realtime safety
critical systems.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
You have to understand me Sir and Madam, you have seen
me explaining to you why C++ and C are bad for realtime
safety critical systems, here is another proof that
makes C++ and C not suitable for realtime safety critical systems,
The c++11 have a weak software memory model and that`s not acceptable
for safety critical systems, simply because with this weak spftware
memory model you risk more , so the weak software memory model doesn`t
follow the spirit of Ada and Delphi and FreePascal, so this is why
FreePascal and Delphi follows the Strong memory model of the x86
architecture on an x86 architecture and that simplify the reasonning
about synchronization algorithms etc and that`s good for Realtime safety
critical systems.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages