Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
On-line Clang compiler
68 views
Skip to first unread message
Vlad from Moscow
Jan 29, 2015, 11:12:18 AM1/29/15
to
Is any on-line Clang compiler?
Öö Tiib
Jan 29, 2015, 1:35:26 PM1/29/15
to
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:12:18 UTC+2, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
> Is any on-line Clang compiler?
http://gcc.godbolt.org/ generates x86 assembler with clang 3.4.1
> Is any on-line Clang compiler?
Vlad from Moscow
Jan 29, 2015, 1:41:02 PM1/29/15
to
Öö Tiib
Jan 29, 2015, 2:03:10 PM1/29/15
to
Message has been deleted
Vlad from Moscow
Jan 29, 2015, 2:54:57 PM1/29/15
to
Öö Tiib
Jan 29, 2015, 3:09:43 PM1/29/15
to
On Thursday, 29 January 2015 21:14:34 UTC+2, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
> A C++ compiler does not execute a C++ program.
>
> A C++ compiler /translates/ a C++ program.
> A C++ /implementation/ executes a C++ program.
>
> So what the questioner is looking for might be
> a Clang-based /implementation/ rather than
> a Clang compiler.
Perhaps go teach ISO C++ guys first ... they are sort of authority
about C++. However on https://isocpp.org/get-started they
list http://melpon.org/wandbox/ among "online compiler pages"
not among "online implementation pages" like you seem to suggest.
> 嘱 Tiib <oot...@hot.ee> writes:
> >On Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:41:02 UTC+2, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
> >On Thursday, 29 January 2015 20:41:02 UTC+2, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
> >>On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 9:35:26 PM UTC+3, 嘱 Tiib wrote:
> >>>On Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:12:18 UTC+2, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
> >>>>Is any on-line Clang compiler?
> >>>On Thursday, 29 January 2015 18:12:18 UTC+2, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
> >>>>Is any on-line Clang compiler?
> >>Thnaks but I would prefer an on-line compiler that allows to run a program.
> (...) >attempts to run it
>
> A C++ compiler does not execute a C++ program.
>
> A C++ compiler /translates/ a C++ program.
> A C++ /implementation/ executes a C++ program.
>
> So what the questioner is looking for might be
> a Clang-based /implementation/ rather than
> a Clang compiler.
Perhaps go teach ISO C++ guys first ... they are sort of authority
about C++. However on https://isocpp.org/get-started they
list http://melpon.org/wandbox/ among "online compiler pages"
not among "online implementation pages" like you seem to suggest.
Message has been deleted
Heinz Müller
Jan 29, 2015, 3:39:35 PM1/29/15
to
Stefan Ram wrote:
> A C++ compiler does not execute a C++ program.
>
> A C++ compiler /translates/ a C++ program.
> A C++ /implementation/ executes a C++ program.
>
> So what the questioner is looking for might be
> a Clang-based /implementation/ rather than
> a Clang compiler.
You're talented in giving useless comments.
> A C++ compiler does not execute a C++ program.
>
> A C++ compiler /translates/ a C++ program.
> A C++ /implementation/ executes a C++ program.
>
> So what the questioner is looking for might be
> a Clang-based /implementation/ rather than
> a Clang compiler.
G DeR
Jan 30, 2015, 1:26:10 PM1/30/15
to
Il 29/01/2015 21:23, Stefan Ram ha scritto:
> not that false to list an implementation as a compiler.
>
> A compiler, however, is not an implementation, nor does
> it contain an implementation. So it would usually be
> false to list a compiler as an implementation.
>
>
>
Pedantry can sometimes provide two mutually exclusive indications
on one's personality. In one case, the picture is that of a person
devoted to a deep understanding of any subject, whose knowledge
originates from scrupulous attention to every detail, which is then
applied constantly, in any domain, as an established habit. In the
other case, such attitude highlights one's attention to unnecessary
and redudant quibbles, as evidence of a poor level of insight and low
consideration for other people, fact that results in a clumsy attempt
to show off one's own presumed insightfulness, while it inevitably
translates to childish exhibitionism and tangible superficiality to
other people's eyes.
--
Yet another musician
> Öö Tiib <oot...@hot.ee> writes:
>> Perhaps go teach ISO C++ guys first ... they are sort of authority
>> about C++. However on https://isocpp.org/get-started they
>> list http://melpon.org/wandbox/ among "online compiler pages"
>> not among "online implementation pages" like you seem to suggest.
>
> An implementation usually contains a compiler, so it is
>> Perhaps go teach ISO C++ guys first ... they are sort of authority
>> about C++. However on https://isocpp.org/get-started they
>> list http://melpon.org/wandbox/ among "online compiler pages"
>> not among "online implementation pages" like you seem to suggest.
>
> not that false to list an implementation as a compiler.
>
> A compiler, however, is not an implementation, nor does
> it contain an implementation. So it would usually be
> false to list a compiler as an implementation.
>
>
>
Pedantry can sometimes provide two mutually exclusive indications
on one's personality. In one case, the picture is that of a person
devoted to a deep understanding of any subject, whose knowledge
originates from scrupulous attention to every detail, which is then
applied constantly, in any domain, as an established habit. In the
other case, such attitude highlights one's attention to unnecessary
and redudant quibbles, as evidence of a poor level of insight and low
consideration for other people, fact that results in a clumsy attempt
to show off one's own presumed insightfulness, while it inevitably
translates to childish exhibitionism and tangible superficiality to
other people's eyes.
--
Yet another musician
Andrey Tarasevich
Feb 3, 2015, 7:04:01 PM2/3/15
to
On 1/29/2015 8:12 AM, Vlad from Moscow wrote:
> Is any on-line Clang compiler?
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/
> Is any on-line Clang compiler?
The command line at the bottom is editable. If it doesn't say 'clang'
already, just edit it to replace the 'g++' with 'clang'.
--
Best regards,
Andrey Tarasevich
0 new messages