On Thursday, 16 January 2020 03:38:29 UTC+2,
woodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 5:21:26 PM UTC-6, Öö Tiib wrote:
> > On Thursday, 16 January 2020 00:09:59 UTC+2, Daniel wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 at 2:21:56 PM UTC-5,
woodb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > my on-line code generator:
> > > >
https://github.com/Ebenezer-group/onwards
> > > >
> > > Is anyone using this? Nobody is raising issues.
> >
> > His serialization format is not even documented. Plus he wants to
> > keep something of it
>
> The serialization format isn't proprietary. What's private/
> proprietary is the program that generates the code. I have
> a library and 3 programs that use the library. The library
> and two of the programs are in the repository. The third
> program, though is closed source. And I encourage other
> developers to not neglect developing some closed source.
Feel free to develop closed source. Just the rest of it
should be attractive enough to at least try out without that
closed source of with free or trial edition of that closed
source.
> > proprietary and closed source and so there
> > likely will never be actual users.
>
> Unlike a lot of services out there, it's free.
> Once we get past the whiners, the sky is the limit.
I did not whine. I would actually be happy if you would
analyze yourself what is causing these to be more successful:
You may disagree with my comments about documentation,
standardization, availability of APIs, support for multiple
platforms and multiple programming languages, tutorials, forums and
ease to use. I am just someone from Internet. However you need to have
some special strength. Some other unique sales point than that you
believe G-d and like Ben Shapiro. In what sense your product shines
compared to all those others? People of your ethnic origins have
been always famous for their remarkable trading skills.
> > He could still maybe generate code for any of those serialization
> > formats or for any of serialization libraries that use those formats.
> > Online or offline does not matter. Anyone can put offline tool out
> > as online service as idle time hobby within weeks.
>
> It's 2020 and C++ compilers are not written as
> services. Have compiler vendors lost track of
> what they should be doing in part due to an
> avalanche of features added to the language?
How so? In several posts in this group I see links to
godbolt or coliru as free service to compile and run
C++ snippets. Currently all aspects of development
can be done in cloud. I am in few clicks away from
compiling, uploading, running tests on test racks
somewhere in Finland and others in Denmark. All is
done by computing powers somewhere in cloud. I have
never seen either of those test racks. All I see are
results of those tests in my web browser.