Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I have found this threadpool

23 views
Skip to first unread message

Ramine

unread,
Mar 16, 2017, 4:40:01 PM3/16/17
to
Hello,


I have found this threadpool, and i have verified it quickly and
i think that it works with QNX real-time OS, and you can
program with it real-time softwares under QNX.

This is why i think that this guys is smart, look at it here:

https://github.com/ryanlayer/sandbox/tree/master/C/cthreadpool


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane,

Ramine

unread,
Mar 16, 2017, 4:51:25 PM3/16/17
to
He doesn't use dynamic memory, he has used static arrays, and
he has used pthread , this is why you can program with it
real-time softwares under QNX real-time OS, i think
that this guy has avoided dynamic array because he has
needed his threadpool to be able to do with it real-time softwares.

This is why i think that this guy is smart, look at it here:


https://github.com/ryanlayer/sandbox/tree/master/C/cthreadpool


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Rick C. Hodgin

unread,
Mar 16, 2017, 6:13:04 PM3/16/17
to
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 at 4:40:01 PM UTC-4, Ramine wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found this threadpool, and i have verified it quickly and
> i think that it works with QNX real-time OS, and you can
> program with it real-time softwares under QNX.
>
> This is why i think that this guys is smart...

The above was posted at 4:40pm local time.
Then you post the following at 5:12pm, 32 minutes later, Ramine:

> Hello,
> Sorry, i have verified again and this threadpool is stupid and
> garbage..
> This guy is not smart...

He goes from "smart" and a threadpool resource you're going to use
on your critical real-time system, to "not smart" with his "stupid
and garbage" threadpool resource ... in 32 minutes!

-----
Can I suggest that you take what you learned with your degrees
at university and apply them philosophically toward this end:

Write your articles on your local machine, and then WAIT
ONE DAY before finally posting your thoughts on them.

Unless there's an airstrike involved, none of us are going to
be harmed by you waiting an extra day before posting your FINAL
thoughts on something.

And, as Chris M. Thomasson points out ... please do so on one
thread.

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

kushal bhattacharya

unread,
Mar 17, 2017, 6:21:33 AM3/17/17
to
exactly man please dont post anything crappy
0 new messages